Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48948
Title: Principles of cytoreductive surgery for primary and metastatic peritoneal malignancies-the PSOGI-ESGO-ISSPP Lyon consensus
Authors: Bhatt, Aditi
Stepanyan, Artem
Al-Niaimi, Ahmed
Brennan, Donal
Baumgartner, Joel
Bakrin, Naoual
Chi, Dennis
Deraco, Marcello
Ferron, Gwenael
Fotopoulou, Christina
Kepenekian, Vahan
Kusamura, Shigeki
Lavoue, Vincent
Moran, Brendan
Planchamp, Francois
Arjona-Sanchez, Alvaro
Sehouli, Jalid
Sukumar, Vivek
Turaga, Kiran
Villeneuve, Laurent
VAN DER SPEETEN, Kurt 
Van Driel, Willemien
Eriksson, Ane Gerda Zahl
Zapardiel, Ignacio
Glehen, Olivier
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Source: The Lancet Oncology, 27 (4) , p. e181 -e194
Abstract: Complete macroscopic resection is the key objective of cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy. However, heterogeneity in terminology and operative technique persists across centres and between surgical and gynaecological disciplines. This study sought to establish international consensus on the nomenclature of cytoreductive surgery procedures, key technical principles of peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections, and management of regional lymph nodes in the context of peritoneal malignancy. A modified Delphi process was undertaken involving 148 surgical and gynaecological oncologists across six continents. Cytoreductive surgery was endorsed as the preferred term for potentially curative surgery for peritoneal malignancy. Agreement was reached on core principles guiding peritonectomy, including the extent of peritoneal resection around tumour deposits. For visceral resections, the panel favoured a conservative, tumour biology-informed strategy that considers disease distribution and patient-specific factors. The group recommended selective removal of clinically enlarged nodes only. This global consensus defines foundational principles for cytoreductive surgery in patients with peritoneal malignancy and provides standardised terminology and operative guidance that can be integrated into routine surgical practice across various surgical oncology disciplines. Adoption of these recommendations has the potential to reduce variability in cytoreductive surgery techniques, facilitate comparison between studies by increasing standardisation, and facilitate the design and conduct of high-quality surgical trials in peritoneal malignancy.
Notes: Glehen, O (corresponding author), Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Dept Surg Oncol, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France.
olivier.glehen@chu-lyon.fr
Keywords: Humans;Consensus;Delphi Technique;Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures;Peritoneal Neoplasms
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48948
ISSN: 1470-2045
e-ISSN: 1474-5488
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(26)00052-5
ISI #: 001735003600001
Rights: 2026 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version393.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.