Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/48968
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWAETERLOOS, Cato-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-27T11:02:11Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-27T11:02:11Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-04-09T17:03:34Z-
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal of public opinion research, 38 (2) , p. 1 -14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/48968-
dc.description.abstractSocial media have substantially changed the opportunities for political engagement, both in how citizens become informed and learn about politics, as well as in their political participation. On the one hand, citizens can encounter a large diversity of political content on these platforms, both in terms of format and topic. On the other hand, social media are increasingly used by citizens to express their views and mobilize others in highly personalized ways. While social media seem to hold unique opportunities for political learning and participation, it remains unclear how these processes might be linked to each other. Therefore, following communication mediation theory, we explore whether and how political knowledge about current affairs might mediate the association between exposure to political content on social media and participation on these same platforms. Data from a cross-sectional study in Flanders, Belgium (n = 2,520), reveal a complex participatory cycle. While citizens do seem to learn from social media political content, those who are more knowledgeable engage less in social media political participation. While unexpected, these findings highlight the importance of considering the unique social media affordances when researching political socialization and participation.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Special Research Funds at University of Antwerp and KU Leuven (iBOF-project with grant number IBOF/23/036). The interpretation of the data, the writing of the article and the decision to submit the article were the sole responsibility of the author and were not influenced by the funding institution. Acknowledgements This study was conducted as a part of the iBOF project ‘POLKNOW’. I wish to thank all my colleagues on the project at KU Leuven and University of Antwerp for the collaboration. In particular, I would like to express my gratitude to Desiree Schmuck and Michaël Opgenhaffen for their useful input and coordination of the project, and Margot Lissens and Babette Hermans for their support during the data collection.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOxford Academic-
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)-
dc.subject.othersocial media-
dc.subject.otherpolitical participation-
dc.subject.otherpolitical knowledge-
dc.subject.othercontent exposure-
dc.subject.othersocialization-
dc.titleA new window to the world? Associations between political social media content, political knowledge and participation on social media-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage14-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.volume38-
local.format.pages14-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.referencesReferences Amsalem, E., & Zoizner, A. (2023). Do people learn about politics on social media? A meta-analysis of 76 studies. Journal of Communication, 73(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqac034 Andersen, K., Bjarnøe, C., Albæk, E., & De Vreese, C. H. (2016). How news type matters: Indirect effects of media use on political participation through knowledge and efficacy. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(3), 111–122. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/ a000201 Andersen, K., Ohme, J., Bjarnøe, C., Bordacconi, M. J., Albæk, E., & De Vreese, C. H. (2020). Generational gaps in political media use and civic engagement: From Baby Boomers to Generation Z (1st ed.). Oxford: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003111498. Barabas, J., Jerit, J., Pollock, W., & Rainey, C. (2014). The question(s) of political knowledge. The American Political Science Review, 108(4), 840–855. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000392 Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 Bolsen, T., & Leeper, T. J. (2013). Self-interest and attention to news among issue publics. Political Communication, 30(3), 329–348. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737428 Boukes, M. (2019). Social network sites and acquiring current affairs knowledge: The impact of Twitter and Facebook usage on learning about the news. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(1), 36–51. doi: 10.1080/19331681. 2019.1572568 Boulianne, S. (2019). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication and Society, 22(1), 39–54. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353641 Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (Vol. 103. 13–28). Berlin: Peter Lang. Cammaerts, B. (2015). Technologies of self-mediation: Affordances and constraints of social media for protest movements. In Civic engagement and social media (pp. 87–110). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Caren, N., Andrews, K. T., & Lu, T. (2020). Contemporary social movements in a hybrid media environment. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 443–465. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919- 054627 Castro, L., Stromback, J., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., de Vreese, C., Aalberg, T., Cardenal, A. S., Corbu, N., Hopmann, D. N., Koc-Michalska, K., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Sheafer, T., Splendore, S., Stanyer, J., Stępińska, A., Štětka, V., & Theocharis, Y. (2022). Navigating high-choice European political Table A1 Continued Construct and items Response options Theme (angle) % of correct answers National Gallery in London. Why did they do that? Palestine, They were protesting against the use of fossil fuels The organization of the COP28 climate conference was criticized for several reasons, among others due to the location of the conference. Where was that? Doha (Qatar), Dubai (United Arab Emirates), Beijing (China) Climate (Formal) 62.3% Response options M (SD) Political content exposure on social media Belgian politics (e.g., politicians, policy, elections) Never–very often (1–5) 3.16 (1.27) International politics, war, and conflict (e.g., Israel–Palestine, Ukraine) Never–very often (1–5) 3.57 (1.38) Climate (e.g., protests, climate change) Never–very often (1–5) 3.19 (1.24) Social justice (e.g., racism, gender, sexuality) Never–very often (1–5) 3.09 (1.23) (Mental) health (e.g., care, vaccines, depression) Never–very often (1–5) 2.87 (1.14) Migration (e.g., border control, policy, refugees) Never–very often (1–5) 3.07 (1.28) Social media political participation Posted or shared something on a political or societal topic Never–very often (1–5) 1.76 (1.11) Commented on something on a political or societal topic Never–very often (1–5) 1.84 (1.12) Changed your profile picture to express yourself on a political or societal topic Never–very often (1–5) 1.32 (.76) Indicated that you would attend an event on a political or societal topic Never–very often (1–5) 1.37 (.83) Overall social media use Facebook Never–Multiple times a day (1–6) 4.28 (1.96) Twitter/X Never–Multiple times a day (1–6) 1.68 (1.42) TikTok Never–Multiple times a day (1–6) 1.69 (1.53) Instagram Never–Multiple times a day (1–6) 3.15 (2.12) Youtube Never–Multiple times a day (1–6) 3.28 (1.63) Note: SD = standard deviation. International Journal Of Public Opinion Research, 2026, Volume 38, Issue 2 11 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ijpor/article/38/2/edag009/8650563 by guest on 09 April 2026 information environments: A comparative analysis of news user profiles and political knowledge. International Journal of Press/ Politics, 27(4), 827–859. doi: 10.1177/19401612211012572 Chen, H.-T. (2019). Second screening and the engaged public: The role of second screening for news and political expression in an OSROR model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 526–546. doi: 10.1177/1077699019866432 Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an OSROR model of communication effects. Communication Theory: CT: A Journal of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 66–88. doi: 10.1111/j. 1468-2885.2008.01333.x Choi, D.-H. (2023). Social media use and interpersonal discussion in democratic political process: Examining differential gains from social Media. International Journal of Contents, 19(4), 50–60. doi: 10.5392/IJoC.2023.19.4.050 Corrigall-Brown, C., & Wilkes, R. (2014). Media exposure and the engaged citizen: How the media shape political participation. Social Science Journal, 51(3), 408–421. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij. 2014.03.009 Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98. doi: 10. 1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x Dekoninck, H., & Schmuck, D. (2022). The mobilizing power of influencers for pro-environmental behavior intentions and political participation. Environmental Communication, 16(4), 458–472. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2022.2027801 Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. de Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41(4), 317–341. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap. 5500164 Dreston, J. H., & Neubaum, G. (2023). How incidental and intentional news exposure in social media relate to political knowledge and voting intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14,. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1250051 Earl, J. (2014). Something old and something new: A comment on “new media, new civics”. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 169–175. doi: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI357 Eveland, W. P., Jr., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359–386. 10.1177/0093650203253369 Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 Fetterman, A. K., Muscanell, N. L., Wu, D., & Sassenberg, K. (2022). When you are wrong on Facebook, just admit it: Wrongness admission leads to better interpersonal impressions on social media. Social Psychology, 53(1), 34–45. doi: 10.1027/1864- 9335/a000473 Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Gonzalez, A., Schmuck, D., & Vandenbosch, L. (2024). Posting and framing politics: A content analysis of celebrities’, athletes’, and influencers’ Instagram political content. Information, Communication and Society, 27(8), 1605–1627. doi: 10.1080/ 1369118X.2023.2285495 Graves, L. (2017). The monitorial citizen in the “democratic recession”. Journalism Studies, 18(10), 1239–1250. doi: 10.1080/ 1461670X.2017.1338153 Hagar, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2025). Algorithmic indifference: The dearth of news recommendations on TikTok. New Media & Society, 27(6), 3449–3469. doi: 10.1177/14614448231192964 Hartmann, D., Wang, S. M., Pohlmann, L., & Berendt, B. (2025). A systematic review of echo chamber research: Comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes. Journal of Computational Social Science, 8(2),. doi: 10.1007/s42001-025-00381-z Heiss, R., Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2020). Pathways to political (dis-)engagement: Motivations behind social media use and the role of incidental and intentional exposure modes in adolescents’ political engagement. IEEE Transactions on Communications: IEEE Communications Society, 45(s1), 671–693. doi: 10.1515/commun-2019-2054 Hoffmann, C. P., & Lutz, C. (2021). Digital divides in political participation: The mediating role of social media self-efficacy and privacy concerns. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 6–29. doi: 10.1002/ poi3.225 Holecz, V., Fernández, G. G. E., & Giugni, M. (2022). Broadening political participation: The impact of socializing practices on young people’s action repertoires. Politics, 42(1), 58–74. doi: 10.1177/02633957211041448 Hopp, T., Ferrucci, P., Vargo, C., & Liu, L. (2025). Is online textual political expression associated with political knowledge? Communication Research, 52(1), 32–60. doi: 10.1177/ 00936502221113808 Jung, N., Kim, Y., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication & Society, 14(4), 407–430. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.496135 Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research, 36(2), 254–284. doi: 10.1177/ 0093650208330253 Kim, D. H., & Ellison, N. B. (2022). From observation on social media to offline political participation: The social media affordances approach. New Media & Society, 24(12), 2614–2634. doi: 10.1177/1461444821998346 Kim, D. H., Jones-Jang, S. M., & Kenski, K. (2021). Why do people share political information on social media? Digital Journalism, 9(8), 1123–1140. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2020. 1827966 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. Knoll, J., Matthes, J., & Heiss, R. (2020). The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 135–156. doi: 10.1177/ 1354856517750366 12 International Journal Of Public Opinion Research, 2026, Volume 38, Issue 2 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ijpor/article/38/2/edag009/8650563 by guest on 09 April 2026 Lane, D. S., Do, K., & Molina-Rogers, N. (2022). What is political expression on social media anyway?: A systematic review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(3), 331–345. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2021.1985031 Lane, D. S., & Neubaum, G. (2025). To express or not express: A motivational approach to studying political expression on social media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2025.2530443 Lee, N. (2017). Communication mediation model. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. Zoonen (Eds.), The international Encyclopedia of media effects (1st ed., pp. 1–9). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi: 10. 1002/9781118783764.wbieme0093 Lee, S., Diehl, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2021). Rethinking the virtuous circle hypothesis on social media: Subjective versus objective knowledge and political participation. Human Communication Research, 48(1), 57–87. doi: 10.1093/hcr/hqab014 Lee, S., Nanz, A., & Heiss, R. (2022). Platform-dependent effects of incidental exposure to political news on political knowledge and political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 127,. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107048 Lee, S., & Xenos, M. (2022). Incidental news exposure via social media and political participation: Evidence of reciprocal effects. New Media & Society, 24(1), 178–201. doi: 10.1177/ 1461444820962121 Leyva, R. (2017). Exploring UK Millennials’ social media consumption patterns and participation in elections, activism, and “slacktivism”. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 462–479. doi: 10.1177/0894439316655738 Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2019). Youth collective political expression on social media: The role of affordances and memetic dimensions for voicing political views. New Media & Society, 21(9), 1988–2009. doi: 10.1177/1461444819837571 Mede, N. G., Kobilke, L., Fawzi, N., & Zerback, T. (2025). The climate change generation: Vocal but overconfident? How young adults who overestimate their climate knowledge use social media and engage with others. Social Media + Society, 11(2),. doi: 10.1177/20563051251341792 Moeller, J., & De Vreese, C. (2019). Spiral of political learning: The reciprocal relationship of news media use and political knowledge among adolescents. Communication Research, 46(8), 1078–1094. doi: 10.1177/0093650215605148 Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters institute digital news report 2023. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. doi: 10.60625/ risj-p6es-hb13 Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Ross Arguedas, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Reuters institute digital news report 2024. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. doi: 10.60625/RISJ-VY6N-4V57 Ng, E. (2020). No grand pronouncements here…: Reflections on cancel culture and digital media participation. Television & New Media, 21(6), 621–627. doi: 10.1177/1527476420918828 Niemi, R. G., & Hepburn, M. A. (1995). The rebirth of political socialization. Perspectives on Political Science, 24(1), 7–16. doi: 10.1080/10457097.1995.9941860 Ohme, J., & de Vreese, C. (2020). Traditional and “new media” forms and political socialization. In The international Encyclopedia of media psychology (pp. 1–9). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0167 Ohme, J., & Mothes, C. (2025). News snacking and political learning: Changing opportunity structures of digital platform news use and political knowledge. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 22(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/19331681. 2023.2193579 Park, C. S. (2019). Learning politics from social media: Interconnection of social media use for political news and political issue and process knowledge. Communication Studies, 70(3), 253–276. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2019.1581627 Ryan, T. J., & Ehlinger, J. A. (2023). Issue publics: How electoral constituencies hide in plain sight (1st edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009242400 Schäfer, S., & Schemer, C. (2024). Informed participation? An investigation of the relationship between exposure to different news channels and participation mediated through actual and perceived knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 14,. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1251379 Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. doi: 10.1177/0093650205279209 Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2021). Learning political news from social media: Network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research, 48(1), 125–147. doi: 10.1177/0093650217749354 Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. M. (2001). Values, communication behavior, and political participation. Political Communication, 18(3), 273–300. doi: 10.1080/10584600152400347 Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. M. (2004). Knowledge as understanding: The information processing approach to political learning. In Handbook of political communication research (pp. 357–394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. doi: 10.1080/ 14616700500131950 Suuronen, A., Reinikainen, H., Borchers, N. S., & Strandberg, K. (2022). When social media influencers go political: An exploratory analysis on the emergence of political topics among Finnish influencers. Javnost—The Public, 29(3), 301–317. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2021.1983367 Theocharis, Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media + Society, 1(2),. doi: 10. 1177/2056305115610140 Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1111/comt.12087 Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model: Differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12024 Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., De Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stępińska, A. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for International Journal Of Public Opinion Research, 2026, Volume 38, Issue 2 13 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ijpor/article/38/2/edag009/8650563 by guest on 09 April 2026 democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551 van Erkel, P. F. A., & Van Aelst, P. (2021). Why don’t we learn from social media? Studying effects of and mechanisms behind social media news use on general surveillance political knowledge. Political Communication, 38(4), 407–425. doi: 10.1080/ 10584609.2020.1784328 Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(3), 107–114. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226 Waeterloos, C., Conradie, P., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2021a). Digital issue movements: Political repertoires and drivers of participation among Belgian youth in the context of ‘school strike for climate’. Sustainability, 13(17),. doi: 10.3390/ su13179892 Waeterloos, C., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2021b). Designing and validating the Social Media Political Participation Scale: An instrument to measure political participation on social media. Technology in Society, 64,. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101493 Weeks, B. E., Halversen, A., & Neubaum, G. (2023). Too scared to share? Fear of social sanctions for political expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1). doi: 10.1093/jcmc/zmad041 Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12199 Weinstein, E. C., Rundle, M., & James, C. (2015). A Hush Falls over the crowd: Diminished online civic expression among young civic actors. International Journal of Communication, 9, 84–105. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2901/ 1286 Zaller, J. (2006). The nature and origins of mass opinion (13. printing). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edag009-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationWAETERLOOS, Cato (2026) A new window to the world? Associations between political social media content, political knowledge and participation on social media. In: International journal of public opinion research, 38 (2) , p. 1 -14.-
item.embargoEndDate2026-10-06-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
item.contributorWAETERLOOS, Cato-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0954-2892-
crisitem.journal.eissn1471-6909-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Waeterloos_ANewWindowToTheWorld_AuthorVersion.pdf
  Until 2026-10-06
Peer-reviewed author version447.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.