Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49042
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSADEQI BAJESTANI, Mahdi-
dc.contributor.authorPIRDAVANI, Ali-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-11T12:53:36Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-11T12:53:36Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-04-28T13:26:24Z-
dc.identifier.citationInfrastructures, 11 (5) (Art N° 148)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/49042-
dc.description.abstractSpeed is a key determinant of crash risk and injury severity, particularly on urban and secondary roads with frequent interactions between vulnerable road users. Traffic calming measures (TCMs) encompass physical, regulatory, perceptual, and technological interventions and aim to reduce operating speeds and improve safety and liveability. This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness of TCMs in reducing speed and improving safety outcomes on urban roads, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. It encompasses the identification , screening, and synthesis of articles from the Scopus, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink databases, published between January 2020 and February 2026. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed qualitatively by the co-authors. The assessment was conducted independently , with discrepancies resolved through discussion. A total of 91 studies were included in the review. Evidence from field studies, driving simulator experiments, and analytical, simulation, and computation-based evaluations is reviewed and structured within a three-cluster taxonomy comprising physical and geometrical measures, regulatory and perceptual interventions, and digital and technological approaches. The synthesis indicates that physically self-enforcing measures yield the most consistent reductions in speed. At the same time, regulatory and digital interventions can deliver meaningful safety benefits when implemented at scale with credible governance. Perceptual and advisory measures show more varying and context-dependent effects. The evidence base is limited by heterogeneity in study designs, short-term evaluations, and inconsistent reporting across studies.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.subject.othertraffic calming measures-
dc.subject.otherspeed management-
dc.subject.otherurban roads-
dc.subject.otherroad safety interventions-
dc.titleTraffic Calming Measures in Urban Environment: A Systematic Review-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.volume11-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.placeBasel, Switzerland-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedReview-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr148-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/infrastructures11050148-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorSADEQI BAJESTANI, Mahdi-
item.contributorPIRDAVANI, Ali-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationSADEQI BAJESTANI, Mahdi & PIRDAVANI, Ali (2026) Traffic Calming Measures in Urban Environment: A Systematic Review. In: Infrastructures, 11 (5) (Art N° 148).-
crisitem.journal.eissn2412-3811-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
infrastructures-11-00148-v2.pdfPublished version719 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.