Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49187Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | PELICAEN, Erik | - |
| dc.contributor.author | NOVAIS PASSARELLI, Rafael | - |
| dc.contributor.author | VANDERSMISSEN, Veerle | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Knapen, Elke | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-29T13:40:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-29T13:40:31Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-05-29T13:27:51Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Construction and Building Materials, 529 (Art N° 146479) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49187 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The relatively low bond strength of earth block masonry compared to conventional masonry offers opportunities for circular construction through block reclamation and reuse. Given the absence of a standardised approach, this study proposes a method for evaluating reclamation performance, tested across five representative earth blockmortar combinations. Additionally, bond strength and bond capacity were evaluated statistically as potential predictors of reclamation performance. Non-stabilised moulded earth blocks (MEBs) and cement-stabilised compressed earth blocks (CEBs) were paired with three mortars: earth mortar (EM), thin-layer earth-adhesive mortar (EAM), and bastard-earth mortar (BME). Ten masonry walls were deconstructed using a hammer drill, after which blocks were cleaned with a joint knife. Reclamation performance was assessed using nine effectiveness and efficiency indicators derived from quantitative damage measurements, identification of new failure modes, time recordings, and qualitative ratings. Spearman correlation tests were used to evaluate four potential predictors: shear and flexural bond strength, and shear and flexural bond capacity. CEBs with EM achieved the highest reclamation rate (94%) and efficiency, and the lowest bond strengths (<0.08 MPa). MEB-EM and MEBEAM also achieved high reclamation rates (85% and 91%), but reduced cleaning efficiency, with moderate-tohigh bond strengths (<0.21 MPa). CEB-EAM achieved a poor reclamation rate (28%) and low reclamation efficiency, yet showed the highest bond strengths (>0.26 MPa). CEB-BME achieved the lowest reclamation rate (13%) and efficiency, with moderate bond strengths (similar to 0.15 MPa). Although reclamation outcomes are also influenced by additional material properties, such as block and mortar strength, the shear bond strength and shear bond capacity correlate significantly with reclamation and deconstruction performance indicators, respectively. Future research should reproduce the experiments with different unit-mortar combinations to further validate the proposed method and assess the influence of other material properties on reclamation performance. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by the Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University (BOF20OWB13), and material acquisition was sponsored by the Living Lab Circular Economy “Application of earth blocks in practice”, funded by VLAIO, the Flemish Agency for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, and the NextGenerationEU fund of the European Commission. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | - |
| dc.rights | 2026 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. | - |
| dc.subject.other | Earth block masonry | - |
| dc.subject.other | Circular construction | - |
| dc.subject.other | Reclamation | - |
| dc.subject.other | Reuse | - |
| dc.subject.other | Deconstruction | - |
| dc.subject.other | Shear bond strength | - |
| dc.subject.other | Flexural bond strength | - |
| dc.subject.other | Bond capacity | - |
| dc.subject.other | Failure mode | - |
| dc.subject.other | Stabilisation | - |
| dc.title | Evaluating the reclamation performance of earth block-mortar combinations | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 529 | - |
| local.format.pages | 30 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
| dc.description.notes | Pelicaen, E (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Architecture & Arts, ArcK Res Grp, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. | - |
| dc.description.notes | erik.pelicaen@uhasselt.be | - |
| local.publisher.place | 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 146479 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.146479 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | 001764608300001 | - |
| local.provider.type | wosris | - |
| local.description.affiliation | [Pelicaen, Erik; Passarelli, Rafael Novais; Vandersmissen, Veerle; Knapen, Elke] Hasselt Univ, Fac Architecture & Arts, ArcK Res Grp, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. | - |
| local.uhasselt.international | no | - |
| item.contributor | PELICAEN, Erik | - |
| item.contributor | NOVAIS PASSARELLI, Rafael | - |
| item.contributor | VANDERSMISSEN, Veerle | - |
| item.contributor | Knapen, Elke | - |
| item.embargoEndDate | 2026-12-27 | - |
| item.fullcitation | PELICAEN, Erik; NOVAIS PASSARELLI, Rafael; VANDERSMISSEN, Veerle & Knapen, Elke (2026) Evaluating the reclamation performance of earth block-mortar combinations. In: Construction and Building Materials, 529 (Art N° 146479). | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.accessRights | Embargoed Access | - |
| crisitem.journal.issn | 0950-0618 | - |
| crisitem.journal.eissn | 1879-0526 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| main.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 7.72 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
| ACFrOgB11XFhiDG20EmhablRL9Vj2OJ1x4nO-RSo_HxBxF9vZomRUqcI3KdXms7.pdf Until 2026-12-27 | Peer-reviewed author version | 287.09 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.