Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49267
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuizer, Lisanne-
dc.contributor.authorGuesens, Femke-
dc.contributor.authorGEERITS, Emma-
dc.contributor.authorDevlieger, Roland-
dc.contributor.authorBogaerts, Annick-
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-10T14:53:46Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-10T14:53:46Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-06-09T08:27:18Z-
dc.identifier.citationMayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health,-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/49267-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine whether perceived usability of the INTER-ACT app influences postpartum weight loss and whether this effect is mediated by app use, motivational power, and implementation of lifestyle recommendations. Patients and Methods: Dutch-speaking women aged 18 years or older who had delivered a singleton infant and exceeded the recommended guidelines of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) for gestational weight gain got recruited between May 2017 and April 2019, Across six Flemish hospitals. This secondary analysis included 138 participants of the INTER-ACT intervention arm. At 6 months postpartum participants completed a process evaluation survey, assessing app usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS), perceived motivational power, and perceived implementation of lifestyle recommendations. Weight loss was calculated between 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Pearson correlations and parallel mediation analyses were conducted, adjusting for maternal age, parity, and pre-pregnancy BMI. Results: App usability was moderate (mean SUS=60.6) and positively associated with perceived app use frequency (B=.05, p<.001), motivational power (B=.003, p<.001), and implementation of lifestyle recommendations (B=.01, p=.036), but not with weight loss. Usability showed no total, direct, or indirect effect on weight loss. Gestational weight gain (GWG) was the only significant predictor (B=0.24, p=0.003). Higher usability was also associated with more positive and fewer negative emotional responses (p<.05). Conclusion: App usability was associated with engagement and positive emotional experience, but not with reduced PPWR. GWG remained the main determinant of postpartum weight outcomes. Preventing EGWG and complementing this with emotionally supportive postpartum mHealth tools may improve outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT02989142.-
dc.description.sponsorshipData collection was supported by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Grant/Award Numbers: 1803311N, T005116N, 1803321N and Rotary Foundation, Limburg (Houthalen) Belgium. Further analyses and manuscript preparation was supported by the EU MSCA-JD under grant agreement 101169127 (HAP3 project) and Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Grant/Award Number: G0A1N24N.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights2026 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (MCP: Digital Health) is sponsored by Mayo Clinic and is a companion title to the widely read and cited Mayo Clinic Proceedings . MCP: Digital Health is an online only, open access journal that publishes original research, reviews, narratives of …-
dc.titleApp usability, engagement, and postpartum weight retention: secondary analysis of the INTER-ACT randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsLopez-Jimenez-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.referencesReferences 1. Makama M, Skouteris H, Moran LJ, Lim S. Reducing Postpartum Weight Retention: A Review of the Implementation Challenges of Postpartum Lifestyle Interventions. JCM. 2021 Apr 27;10(9):1891. doi:10.3390/jcm10091891 2. Fadzil F, Shamsuddin K, Wan Puteh SE, Mohd Tamil A, Ahmad S, Abdul Hayi NS, et al. Predictors of postpartum weight retention among urban Malaysian mothers: A prospective cohort study. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. 2018 Nov;12(6):493–9. doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2018.06.003 3. Kew S, Ye C, Hanley AJ, Connelly PW, Sermer M, Zinman B, et al. Cardiometabolic Implications of Postpartum Weight Changes in the First Year After Delivery. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jul 1;37(7):1998–2006. doi:10.2337/dc14-0087 4. Bogaerts A, Van Den Bergh BRH, Ameye L, Witters I, Martens E, Timmerman D, et al. Interpregnancy Weight Change and Risk for Adverse Perinatal Outcome. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013 Nov;122(5):999–1009. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7f63e 5. Liu J, Song G, Meng T, Zhao G, Guo S. Weight retention at six weeks postpartum and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in a second pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec;19(1):272. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2423-3 6. Kirkegaard H, Bliddal M, Støvring H, Rasmussen KM, Gunderson EP, Køber L, et al. Maternal weight change from prepregnancy to 18 months postpartum and subsequent risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in Danish women: A cohort study. Wareham NJ, editor. PLoS Med. 2021 Apr 2;18(4):e1003486. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003486 7. Collings R, Hill B, Skouteris H. The influence of psychological factors on postpartum weight retention 12 months post-birth. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2018 Mar 15;36(2):177–91. doi:10.1080/02646838.2018.1424323 8. Bazzazian S, Riazi H, Vafa M, Mahmoodi Z, Nasiri M, Mokhtaryan-Gilani T, et al. The relationship between depression, stress, anxiety, and postpartum weight retention: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2021 Jan;10(1):230. doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1409_20 9. Endres LK, Straub H, McKinney C, Plunkett B, Minkovitz CS, Schetter CD, et al. Postpartum Weight Retention Risk Factors and Relationship to Obesity at 1 Year. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015 Jan;125(1):144–52. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000565 10. Van Der Pligt P, Willcox J, Hesketh KD, Ball K, Wilkinson S, Crawford D, et al. Systematic review of lifestyle interventions to limit postpartum weight retention: implications for future opportunities to prevent maternal overweight and obesity following childbirth. Obesity Reviews. 2013 Oct;14(10):792–805. doi:10.1111/obr.12053 11. Navigating the Postpartum Period: Hormonal Changes and Essential Care for Women. In: Postpartum Period for Mother and Newborn [Working Title] [Internet]. IntechOpen; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 25]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/1207066 doi:10.5772/intechopen.1008428 12. Hill B, McPhie S, Moran LJ, Harrison P, Huang TTK, Teede H, et al. Lifestyle intervention to prevent obesity during pregnancy: Implications and recommendations for research and implementation. Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:13–8. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.017 13. Lim S, Lang S, Savaglio M, Skouteris H, Moran LJ. Intervention Strategies to Address Barriers and Facilitators to a Healthy Lifestyle Using the Behaviour Change Wheel: A Qualitative Analysis of the Perspectives of Postpartum Women. Nutrients. 2024 Apr 3;16(7):1046. doi:10.3390/nu16071046 14. Evans K, Rennick-Egglestone S, Cox S, Kuipers Y, Spiby H. Remotely Delivered Interventions to Support Women With Symptoms of Anxiety in Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 15;24(2):e28093. doi:10.2196/28093 15. Dietlein CS, Bock OL. Development of a usability scale based on the three ISO 9241-11 categories “effectiveness,” “efficacy” and “satisfaction”: a technical note. Accred Qual Assur. 2019 Jun;24(3):181–9. doi:10.1007/s00769-018-01368-2 16. Jacob C, Sezgin E, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 5;10(5):e36284. doi:10.2196/36284 17. Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Behav Med Pract Policy Res. 2017 Jun;7(2):254–67. doi:10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1 18. McKay FH, Wright A, Shill J, Stephens H, Uccellini M. Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic Search and Rating of Apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 4;7(7):e11926. doi:10.2196/11926 19. Hellweger S, Wang X. What is User Experience Really: towards a UX Conceptual Framework. 20. Saariluoma P, Jokinen JPP. Emotional Dimensions of User Experience: A User Psychological Analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2014 Apr 3;30(4):303–20. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.858460 21. Hanach N, Saqan R, Radwan H, Baniissa W, De Vries N. Perceived Experiences and Needs of Digital Resources Among Postpartum Women in the United Arab Emirates: Qualitative Focus Group Study. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 16;26:e53720. doi:10.2196/53720 22. Lin YP, Lee KC, Ma WF, Syu BS, Liao WC, Yang HT, et al. A mobile technology-based tailored health promotion program for sedentary employees: development and usability study. BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):1452. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22401-3 23. Assessing the Impact of Usability from Evaluating Mobile Health Applications. IJETI. 2024 Feb 26. 24. Geusens F, Van Uytsel H, Ameye L, Devlieger R, Jacquemyn Y, Van Holsbeke C, et al. The impact of self-monitoring physical and mental health via an mHealth application on postpartum weight retention: Data from the INTER-ACT RCT. Health Promot Perspect. 2024 Mar 14;14(1):44–52. doi:10.34172/hpp.42528 25. Xiaocui H, Shengyao Y, Samsudin N, Kuan L, Xuefen L. Empowering postpartum women: the role of mHealth apps in promoting mental health and obesity prevention. BMC Women’s Health. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):351. doi:10.1186/s12905-025-03907-9 26. He X, Hu C, Chen L, Wang Q, Qin F. The association between gestational weight gain and substantial weight retention 1-year postpartum. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):493–9. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3235-3 27. Bogaerts A, Van Uytsel H, Ameye L, Winter Shafran Y, Jacquemyn Y, Van Holsbeke C, et al. Interpregnancy and pregnancy lifestyle intervention (INTER-ACT): a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025 Dec;233(6):668.e1-668.e13. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.05.041 28. Bogaerts A, Ameye L, Bijlholt M, Amuli K, Heynickx D, Devlieger R. INTER-ACT: prevention of pregnancy complications through an e-health driven interpregnancy lifestyle intervention – study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec;17(1):154. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1336-2 29. Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, Institute of Medicine (U.S.), editors. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington, D. C: National Academies Press; 2009. 1 p. 30. Althuizen E, Van Poppel MN, De Vries JH, Seidell JC, Van Mechelen W. Postpartum behaviour as predictor of weight change from before pregnancy to one year postpartum. BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec;11(1):165. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-165 31. Dol J, Richardson B, Murphy GT, Aston M, McMillan D, Campbell-Yeo M. Impact of mobile health interventions during the perinatal period on maternal psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020 Jan;18(1):30–55. doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00191 32. Archuleta J, Chao SM. Maternal Characteristics that Impact Postpartum Weight Retention: Results from the 2016 Los Angeles Mommy and Baby (LAMB) Follow-Up Study. Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jan;25(1):151–61. doi:10.1007/s10995-020-03082-3 33. Clement LM, Bradley-Garcia M. A Step-By-Step Tutorial for Performing a Moderated Mediation Analysis using PROCESS. TQMP. 2022 Oct 1;18(3):258–71. doi:10.20982/tqmp.18.3.p258 34. Ensink CJ, Keijsers NLW, Groen BE. Translation and validation of the System Usability Scale to a Dutch version: D-SUS. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2024 Jan 16;46(2):395–400. doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2160837 35. Brooke J. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. 36. Grier RA, Bangor A, Kortum P, Peres SC. The System Usability Scale: Beyond Standard Usability Testing. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2013 Sep;57(1):187–91. doi:10.1177/1541931213571042 37. Hyzy M, Bond R, Mulvenna M, Bai L, Dix A, Leigh S, et al. System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 18;10(8):e37290. doi:10.2196/37290 38. Dix A. Human–computer interaction, foundations and new paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing. 2017 Oct;42:122–34. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2016.04.001 39. O’Brien HL, Roll I, Kampen A, Davoudi N. Rethinking (Dis)engagement in human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior. 2022 Mar;128:107109. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107109 40. Nelson LA, Spieker AJ, LeStourgeon LM, Greevy Jr RA, Molli S, Roddy MK, et al. The Goldilocks Dilemma on Balancing User Response and Reflection in mHealth Interventions: Observational Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 19;12:e47632–e47632. doi:10.2196/47632 41. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors. 2017 Oct 2;5(3–4):ebi-ebi. doi:10.1080/24725838.2017.1411103 42. Falciglia G, Piazza J, Ollberding NJ, Spiess L, Morrow A. A Theory-Based Dietary Intervention for Overweight, Postpartum Mothers and Their Children Improves Maternal Vegetable Intake. OJOG. 2017;07(07):679–92. doi:10.4236/ojog.2017.77068 43. Wilkinson SA, Van Der Pligt P, Gibbons KS, McIntyre HD. Trial for R educing W eight R etention in N ew M ums: a randomised controlled trial evaluating a low intensity, postpartum weight management programme. J Human Nutrition Diet. 2015 Jan;28(s1):15–28. doi:10.1111/jhn.12193 44. Gilmore LA, Klempel MC, Martin CK, Myers CA, Burton JH, Sutton EF, et al. Personalized Mobile Health Intervention for Health and Weight Loss in Postpartum Women Receiving Women, Infants, and Children Benefit: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Journal of Women’s Health. 2017 Jul;26(7):719–27. doi:10.1089/jwh.2016.5947 45. Gunderson EP, Rifas-Shiman SL, Oken E, Rich-Edwards JW, Kleinman KP, Taveras EM, et al. Association of Fewer Hours of Sleep at 6 Months Postpartum with Substantial Weight Retention at 1 Year Postpartum. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2007 Oct 17;167(2):178–87. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm298 46. Whitaker K, Young-Hyman D, Vernon M, Wilcox S. Maternal Stress Predicts Postpartum Weight Retention. Matern Child Health J. 2014 Nov;18(9):2209–17. doi:10.1007/s10995-014-1470-7 47. Szinay D, Perski O, Jones A, Chadborn T, Brown J, Naughton F. Perceptions of Factors Influencing Engagement With Health and Well-being Apps in the United Kingdom: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 16;9(12):e29098. doi:10.2196/29098 48. Oyebode O, Alqahtani F, Orji R. Using Machine Learning and Thematic Analysis Methods to Evaluate Mental Health Apps Based on User Reviews. IEEE Access. 2020;8:111141–58. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002176-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusEarly view-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.contributorDuizer, Lisanne-
item.contributorGuesens, Femke-
item.contributorGEERITS, Emma-
item.contributorDevlieger, Roland-
item.contributorBogaerts, Annick-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationDuizer, Lisanne; Guesens, Femke; GEERITS, Emma; Devlieger, Roland & Bogaerts, Annick (2026) App usability, engagement, and postpartum weight retention: secondary analysis of the INTER-ACT randomized controlled trial. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health,.-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
App usability, engagement, and postpartum weight retention - secondary analysis of the INTER-ACT randomized controlled trial.pdfPeer-reviewed author version454.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.