Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49335
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDevisch, Oswald-
dc.contributor.advisorHuybrechts, Liesbeth-
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-17T11:50:37Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-17T11:50:37Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-06-04T14:34:47Z-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 2: Exploratory Papers and Doctoral Colloquium, Association for Computing Machinery, p. 479 -481-
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-4007-2469-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/49335-
dc.description.abstractAchieving deep decarbonisation requires transformative action, particularly at the neighborhood level, where implementation faces complex institutional, technical, and social barriers. A central challenge is bridging the persistent knowledge and communication gap between institutional actors and local citizens, especially vulnerable households whose situated experiences often clash with abstract policy mandates. This doctoral project investigates a participatory design (PD) project focused on the urban energy transition in Genk, Belgium, analyzing the critical function of youth mobilized as intermediators (or boundary spanners) between institutional plans and their local, multi-generational, and superdiverse communities. This proposal details the project's theoretical scaffolding—Everyday Lived Citizenship (ELC), Boundary Spanning, and Boundary Objects (BOs)—its PD trajectory, progress to date, and the core ethical and political challenges currently being faced. We conclude that foregrounding the intrinsic mediating role of youth, underpinned by co-designed Boundary Objects, offers a viable pathway for addressing the implementation gap, allowing for locally situated and socially inclusive outcomes.-
dc.description.sponsorshipEurope Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Doctoral Networks (MSCA-DN) under the grant agreement 101119451.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAssociation for Computing Machinery-
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0-
dc.titleThe Youth Intermediator: Designing Relational Transitions and Coexistence Through Boundary Objects-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate2026, June 14-19-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenamePDC '26: Participatory Design Conference-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceMilan-
dc.identifier.epage481-
dc.identifier.spage479-
dc.identifier.volume2-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeNew York, NY, United States-
dc.relation.references[1] Claudia V. Angelelli and Federica Ceccoli. 2023. Communication in child language brokering: Role expectation and role performance. Translation and Interpreting Studies. The Journal of the American Translation and Interpreting Studies Association 18, 2 (December 2023), 167–190. [2] Marta Caccamo, Daniel Pittino, and Fredrik Tell. 2023. Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature. Technovation 122, (April 2023), 102645. [3] Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective on JSTOR. Retrieved February 20, 2026 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066?seq=1 [4] Charles R. MartinezJr, Heather H. McClure, and J. Mark Eddy. 2009. Language Brokering Contexts and Behavioral and Emotional Adjustment Among Latino Parents and Adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence 29, 1 (February 2009), 71–98. [5] Alejandro Morales and William E. Hanson. 2005. Language Brokering: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 27, 4 (November 2005), 471–503. [6] Renu Narchal and Rachel Hembrow. 2024. Hidden care: a qualitative exploration of the roles and responsibilities of language brokers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 19, 1 (December 2024), 2371536. [7] Micheline Phlix, Ruth Stevens, Jan Vanrie, An-Sofie Smetcoren, and Ann Petermans. 2024. The ‘right’ place to age? Exploring age-friendly and diversity-sensitive design in a super-diverse neighbourhood. The Design Journal 27, 3 (May 2024), 533–555. [8] Daniela K. Rosner. 2020. Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. [9] Gill Seyfang, Sabine Hielscher, Tom Hargreaves, Mari Martiskainen, and Adrian Smith. 2014. A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 13, (December 2014), 21–44. [10] Van Lier Verdaas, C. M. 2020. Energie en gebiedsontwikkeling: een winnende combinatie. https://www.overheidvannu.nl/documenten/2019/07/04/essay-co-verdaas. Retrieved February 20, 2026 from https://www.overheidvannu.nl/documenten/2019/07/04/essay-co-verdaas [11] Bronwyn Elisabeth Wood. 2022. Youth citizenship: Expanding conceptions of the young citizen. Geography Compass 16, 12 (2022), e12669.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper - Abstract-
local.type.programmehorizonEurope-
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3789492.379645-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 2: Exploratory Papers and Doctoral Colloquium-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
local.relation.horizonEurope101119451-
item.fullcitation (2026) The Youth Intermediator: Designing Relational Transitions and Coexistence Through Boundary Objects. In: Proceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 2: Exploratory Papers and Doctoral Colloquium, Association for Computing Machinery, p. 479 -481.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Youth Intermediator_DC_aslikolbas.docx
  Restricted Access
Published version51.73 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.