Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49496
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMATHEVE, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorDe Baets, Liesbet-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Lotte-
dc.contributor.authorDanneels, Lieven-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T06:54:46Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-02T06:54:46Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-06-22T07:39:09Z-
dc.identifier.citationThe journal of pain, 47 (Art N° 106366)-
dc.identifier.issn1526-5900-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/49496-
dc.description.abstractChronic low back pain (CLBP) is typically defined in terms of pain duration (>3 months) only. However, categorising patients with occasional and persistent LBP together increases clinical heterogeneity in study populations. To address this, the NIH Research Task Force on CLBP recommended including the number of pain days in the CLBP definition (i.e., LBP on more than half of the days over the past 6 months), but its implications remain unclear. In this cross-sectional study, 353 adults with CLBP (>3 months; LBP ≥1 day/week) completed an online survey assessing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including the average number of LBP days/week. The number of pain days/week was moderately associated with pain intensity and disability, but weakly associated with psychological and sociodemographic factors. Participants reporting LBP 4–6 days/week did not differ from those with daily pain, whereas those experiencing LBP 1–3 days/week reported significantly lower pain intensity and disability. Importantly, 50.8–67.2% of participants with 2 or 3 pain days/week still experienced clinically relevant pain intensity or disability. When dichotomised, participants with LBP on ≥4 days/week were more often women and reported higher pain intensity, disability, and symptoms of anxiety and depression than those with <4 days. Finally, psychological factors were more strongly associated with disability in the ≥4-day group compared to the <4-day group. In conclusion, while ≥4 days/week may represent a clinically meaningful cut-off, this criterion excludes a substantial subgroup with clinically relevant CLBP, for whom findings in populations with more frequent LBP may not be representative. Perspective Pain frequency reflects meaningful differences in pain intensity and disability in CLBP. While higher-frequency pain identifies a more severe clinical subgroup of patients, individuals with fewer pain days can still experience substantial impairment, underscoring the need for nuanced CLBP definitions in research and clinical practice.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE-
dc.rightsPublished by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.-
dc.subject.otherChronic low back pain-
dc.subject.otherPain frequency-
dc.subject.otherPain days-
dc.subject.otherDefinition-
dc.subject.otherDisability-
dc.titleDefining chronic low back pain: should we include the number of pain days?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.volume47-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesMatheve, T (corresponding author), Univ Ghent, Dept Rehabil Sci, Spine Head & Pain Res Unit Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesThomas.Matheve@UGent.be-
local.publisher.placeJOURNAL PRODUCTION DEPT, ROBERT STEVENSON HOUSE, 1-3 BAXTERS PLACE, LEITH WALK, EDINBURGH EH1 3AF, MIDLOTHIAN, SCOTLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr106366-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106366-
dc.identifier.pmid42320822-
dc.identifier.isi001808581100001-
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8447-
local.provider.typeCrossRef-
local.description.affiliation[Matheve, Thomas; Danneels, Lieven] Univ Ghent, Dept Rehabil Sci, Spine Head & Pain Res Unit Ghent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Matheve, Thomas; Janssens, Lotte] Hasselt Univ, REVAL Rehabil Res Ctr, Wetenschaps Pk 7, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[De Baets, Liesbet] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Movement & Rehabil Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci, Musculoskeletal Rehabil Res Grp, Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[De Baets, Liesbet] UZ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Leuven Ctr Algol & Pain Management, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[De Baets, Liesbet] UZ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[De Baets, Liesbet] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Dept Physiotherapy Human Physiol & Anat, Pain Mot PAIN Res Grp, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.embargoEndDate2027-01-02-
item.contributorMATHEVE, Thomas-
item.contributorDe Baets, Liesbet-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Lotte-
item.contributorDanneels, Lieven-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationMATHEVE, Thomas; De Baets, Liesbet; JANSSENS, Lotte & Danneels, Lieven (2026) Defining chronic low back pain: should we include the number of pain days?. In: The journal of pain, 47 (Art N° 106366).-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
crisitem.journal.issn1526-5900-
crisitem.journal.eissn1528-8447-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Manuscript_Revision_+_Tables.pdf
  Until 2027-01-02
Peer-reviewed author version618.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Matheve 2026, CLBP definition - J Pain.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version471.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.