Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49511
Title: Adaptation and anticipation mechanisms under unpredictable auditory perturbations: The role of perturbation type, stimulus complexity and cerebellar impairment
Authors: MOUMDJIAN, Lousin 
Rosso, Mattia
Manto, Mario
Keller, Peter E.
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Source: Behavioural brain research, 513 (Art N° 116302)
Abstract: Introduction: Aligning movements with external rhythms depends on temporal adaptation and anticipation, jointly captured by the ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM). Cerebellar pathology disrupts these mechanisms during gradual tempo changes, but its role in synchronization under unpredictable rhythmic structure remains unclear. Methods: Sixty-one participants (16 cerebellar, 45 controls) performed a finger-tapping task at 100 beats-per-minute with phase-shifts (+/- 90 degrees) or period-changes (+/- 10%). Synchronization was assessed by quantifying asynchrony (mean, variability) and modeled with ADAM to estimate adaptation (phase, period correction), anticipation (temporal prediction, anticipatory error correction), and noise (timekeeper, motor). Mixed-effects ANOVAs assessed effects of group, stimulus, and perturbation type; regressions identified predictors of synchronization variability. Results: Patients showed higher asynchrony variability. Both groups increased phase and period correction from baseline to perturbation (p < 0.001), with stronger changes for period than phase perturbations (p < 0.006). Controls corrected more to metronomes, yet patients engaged period correction for music (p = 0.009). Temporal prediction relied on weighed averaging of preceding intervals under perturbations (p = 0.008), more with music, and particularly in patients (p = 0.0095). Anticipatory error correction was higher for metronomes than music (p = 0.045) and for period-changes (p < 0.0001), with stimulus effects restricted to controls. Timekeeper and motor noise rose with perturbations (p < 0.0001) and strongly predicted synchronization variability. Conclusion: Period-changes engaged adaptation more than phase-shifts, and music elicited larger corrective responses than metronomes. Patients showed reduced phase correction for metronomes, greater reliance on period correction for music, and elevated timekeeper noise. Findings indicate that the cerebellum contributes to multiple components of adaptation and anticipation, offering insights for designing targeted rehabilitation.
Notes: Moumdjian, L (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, REVAL Rehabil Res Ctr, Hasselt, Belgium.
Lousin.moumdjian@uhasselt.be
Keywords: Phase shifts;Period changes;Cerebellum;Sensory-motor synchronization;Modelling;Parameter estimates;Finger-tapping
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49511
ISSN: 0166-4328
e-ISSN: 1872-7549
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116302
ISI #: 001788425600001
Rights: 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version3.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.