Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49511| Title: | Adaptation and anticipation mechanisms under unpredictable auditory perturbations: The role of perturbation type, stimulus complexity and cerebellar impairment | Authors: | MOUMDJIAN, Lousin Rosso, Mattia Manto, Mario Keller, Peter E. |
Issue Date: | 2026 | Publisher: | ELSEVIER | Source: | Behavioural brain research, 513 (Art N° 116302) | Abstract: | Introduction: Aligning movements with external rhythms depends on temporal adaptation and anticipation, jointly captured by the ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM). Cerebellar pathology disrupts these mechanisms during gradual tempo changes, but its role in synchronization under unpredictable rhythmic structure remains unclear. Methods: Sixty-one participants (16 cerebellar, 45 controls) performed a finger-tapping task at 100 beats-per-minute with phase-shifts (+/- 90 degrees) or period-changes (+/- 10%). Synchronization was assessed by quantifying asynchrony (mean, variability) and modeled with ADAM to estimate adaptation (phase, period correction), anticipation (temporal prediction, anticipatory error correction), and noise (timekeeper, motor). Mixed-effects ANOVAs assessed effects of group, stimulus, and perturbation type; regressions identified predictors of synchronization variability. Results: Patients showed higher asynchrony variability. Both groups increased phase and period correction from baseline to perturbation (p < 0.001), with stronger changes for period than phase perturbations (p < 0.006). Controls corrected more to metronomes, yet patients engaged period correction for music (p = 0.009). Temporal prediction relied on weighed averaging of preceding intervals under perturbations (p = 0.008), more with music, and particularly in patients (p = 0.0095). Anticipatory error correction was higher for metronomes than music (p = 0.045) and for period-changes (p < 0.0001), with stimulus effects restricted to controls. Timekeeper and motor noise rose with perturbations (p < 0.0001) and strongly predicted synchronization variability. Conclusion: Period-changes engaged adaptation more than phase-shifts, and music elicited larger corrective responses than metronomes. Patients showed reduced phase correction for metronomes, greater reliance on period correction for music, and elevated timekeeper noise. Findings indicate that the cerebellum contributes to multiple components of adaptation and anticipation, offering insights for designing targeted rehabilitation. | Notes: | Moumdjian, L (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, REVAL Rehabil Res Ctr, Hasselt, Belgium. Lousin.moumdjian@uhasselt.be |
Keywords: | Phase shifts;Period changes;Cerebellum;Sensory-motor synchronization;Modelling;Parameter estimates;Finger-tapping | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49511 | ISSN: | 0166-4328 | e-ISSN: | 1872-7549 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116302 | ISI #: | 001788425600001 | Rights: | 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| main.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 3.19 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.