Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49525
Title: Automated prospective quality assurance of tumor segmentation and treatment planning in the hypo-FLAME 3.0 trial
Authors: Surewaard, Joost
Bosschaert, Ruben
Beemster, Herbert
Schipaanboord, Bas
Dassen, Mathijs G.
Akdag, Osman
Doodeman, Barry
van den Bergh, Fons
Kunze-Busch, Martina
De Roover , Robin
Draulans, Cedric
Haustermans, Karin
Schuring, Danny
Piersma, Hendrik
Pelgrims, Ans
Coelmont, Ann
Stoian, Georgiana
de Boer, Hans C. J.
GEENS, Koen 
Poeta, Sara
Janssen, Tomas M.
Pos, Floris J.
van der Heide, Uulke A.
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Source: Radiotherapy and oncology, 221 (Art N° 111608)
Abstract: Background and purpose: Iso-toxic focal boosting in prostate cancer radiotherapy is associated with improved disease-free survival but faces challenges due to tumor segmentation variability and unconventional treatment planning. The aim of this study was to develop an automated system of prospective quality assurance (QA) on tumor segmentation and treatment planning in a clinical trial setting and to implement it in the study arm of the multi-center hypo-FLAME 3.0 trial (NCT05705921) on iso-toxic focal boosting. Materials and methods: We developed an automated QA system to process data from participating centers, apply tumor segmentation evaluation models and plan evaluation models and generate reports for centralized review. Tumor segmentation was evaluated by a model generating tumor probability maps from MRI scans. Focal boost quality was evaluated with a model predicting achievable near-minimum dose for each tumor based on anatomical features.<br /> Results: The QA system was applied to 134 patients who participated in the study arm of the hypo-FLAME 3.0 trial between June 2023 and July 2025. They were recruited from 11 centers in the Netherlands and Belgium. Three and 10 out of 134 cases were recommended for resegmentation and replanning, respectively. We responded to external institutes within 12 business hours in 77% and 81% of the cases for the segmentation and the planning QA, respectively.<br /> Conclusion: We developed an automated system of prospective QA in a clinical trial setting and implemented it for all patients in the study arm of the phase III hypo-FLAME 3.0 trial.
Notes: van der Heide, UA (corresponding author), Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
j.surewaard@nki.nl; u.vd.heide@nki.nl
Keywords: Clinical trial;Quality assurance
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49525
ISSN: 0167-8140
e-ISSN: 1879-0887
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111608
ISI #: 001786897100001
Rights: 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version5.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.