Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49558
Title: Evaluation of tumor localization accuracy on fast ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography using patient-specific breathing curves and a dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom☆
Authors: Daenen, Lars H. B. A.
Lustermans, Didier
Stassen, Tim H. A.
Szkitsak, Juliane
ABDULRAHIM, Roua 
Rishmawi, Gina
Goossens , Jo
Canters, Richard
Rinaldi, Ilaria
Verhaegen, Frank
Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Source: Physics & Imaging in Radiation Oncology, 39 (Art N° 101014)
Abstract: Background and purpose: Fast cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on ring-gantry systems allows for improved image quality and fast 6-second acquisition. However, 6-second acquisition might pose challenges regarding target delineation and capturing the full range of motion of moving lung tumors. Especially, in patients with slow (period > 6 s) or irregular breathing, capturing the entire tumor motion might not be guaranteed. Materials and methods: This study evaluated localization and volumetric accuracy of 6- and 60-second CBCT scans in an in-house dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom, with synchronized imaging capabilities. The phantom was scanned for a sinusoidal and four patient-derived breathing patterns, including regular, slow or irregular breathing. Target position and volume for 6- and 60-second acquisitions were compared to ground truth delineation on time-averaged 4D computed tomography (4DCT) reconstruction, assessing if 6-second acquisition is sufficient to accurately capture the tumor motion. Results: For sinusoidal and regular patient-derived motion, both 6- and 60-second CBCT acquisition captured target motion, compared to 4DCT (Dice Similarity Coefficient, DSC > 0.9). For large amplitudes, only one out of three 6-second scans fully captured target motion (DSC > 0.85). For slow and irregular patient-derived patterns, localization errors and volume differences up to 10.3 mm and 119% were observed using 6-second acquisition, compared to 4DCT, with superior localization and volumetric accuracy of the 60-second acquisition. Conclusion: The 6-second protocol showed accurate results, capturing full target motion for regular breathing patterns. Adaptive protocols, taking into account patient-specific breathing periods and irregularities may be preferred in patients exhibiting slow or irregular breathing.
Notes: Fonseca, GP (corresponding author), Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, GROW Res Inst Oncol & Reprod, Dept Radiat Oncol MAASTRO, Maastricht, Netherlands.
g.paivafonseca@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Keywords: HyperSight CBCT;Lung cancer;Radiotherapy;Respiratory tumor motion;Tumor delineation;4DCT
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49558
e-ISSN: 2405-6316
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2026.101014
ISI #: 001795989300001
Rights: 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
main.pdfPublished version4.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.