Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49588
Title: Global trend and predictors of non-labelled sacubitril-valsartan dosing: results from IKNOW-HF survey
Authors: Yaseen, Israa Fadhil
Farhan, Hasan Ali
Gnanaraj, Justin Paul
Fukaya, Hidehira
Prameswari, Hawani Sasmaya
Saldarriaga, Clara
Kemaloglu Oz, Tugba
Elhout, Somaya Aref
Diez-Villanueva, Pablo
Costanzo, Maria Rosa
Toma, Mustafa
Elsheikh Ibrahim, Nafisa Omar Elsammani
Dakhil, Zainab Atiyah
Mewton, Nathan
MULLENS, Wilfried 
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Source: ESC heart failure, 13 (3) (Art N° xvag162)
Abstract: Background and Aims Optimizing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains vital for heart failure (HF) management. However, non-labelled dosing of sacubitril-valsartan is increasingly reported. This global survey characterized real-world sacubitril-valsartan prescribing patterns and evaluated pharmacist involvement in HF teams.Background and Aims Optimizing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains vital for heart failure (HF) management. However, non-labelled dosing of sacubitril-valsartan is increasingly reported. This global survey characterized real-world sacubitril-valsartan prescribing patterns and evaluated pharmacist involvement in HF teams.Methods The validated 26-item IKNOW-HF survey was disseminated globally to clinicians treating patients with HF. Participation was voluntary and anonymous.Results Out of 1829 responses from 76 countries, 1285 (70.3%) were complete, predominantly from cardiologists 1031 (80.2%). Non-labelled sacubitril-valsartan dosing was reported by 1107 (86.1%) respondents, heavily driven by general cardiologists 326 (90%) and clinicians in the low- and lower-middle-income countries 195 (96%). Predictors of non-labelled dosing included practicing in Asia [odds ratio (OR) 0.347; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.214-0.563)] and having over 10 years of experience [OR 0.695; 95% CI (0.489-0.990)]. The presence of a cardiology pharmacist trended towards a fewer non-labelled prescriptions [OR 0.542; 95% CI (0.283-1.039), P-value = 0.065], whereas management by HF specialist trended towards increased non-labelled usage [OR 1.443; 95% CI (0.981-2.122), P-value = 0.063].Conclusions The IKNOW-HF survey reveals a substantial variation between guideline-recommended and real-world prescribing practices, with over 80% of responding clinicians utilizing non-labelled dosing. The higher prevalence among HF specialists likely reflects a pragmatic salvage strategy for advanced HF patients intolerant to standard target doses. These findings highlight the need for further education, pragmatic clinical trials evaluating real-world dosing outcomes, and broader integration of specialized pharmacists to optimize GDMT.
Notes: Yaseen, IF (corresponding author), Baghdad Heart Ctr, Baghdad Teaching Hosp, Med City, Baghdad, Iraq.
pharm18i@yahoo.com
Keywords: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor;Heart failure;Guideline-directed medical therapy
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49588
ISSN: 2055-5822
e-ISSN: 2055-5822
DOI: 10.1093/eschf/xvag162
ISI #: 001797584800001
Rights: The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
xvag162.pdfPublished version2.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.