Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49612
Title: Comparison of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease characteristics in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus
Authors: Richelle, Donovan
HEYENS, Leen 
Mathieu, Struyve
FRANCQUE, Sven 
ROBAEYS, Geert 
Koek, Ger
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Source: Journal of hepatology, 84 (1) , p. S611 (Art N° WED-185)
Abstract: Background and aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is related to metabolic syndrome (MetS) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). An association between type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and MASLD is not extensively investigated. Therefore, this study investigated the prevalence and risk factors for MASLD in T1DM compared to T2DM. Method: In this Belgian prospective cross-sectional study, MASLD was evaluated via transient elastography (VCTE) for fibrosis and controlled attenuation parameters (CAP) for steatosis (FibroScan ® , Echosens). The cutoff values >248 dB/m for steatosis and 8 kPa for fibrosis were used. MASLD was defined as steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, not including the glucose criterium for the T1DM group. Excessive use of alcohol was excluded. Insulin sensitivity was calculated via estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (eGDR) and SEARCH estimated Insulin Sensitivity (eIS). Associations were explored separately in T1DM and T2DM through logistic regression and compared between groups via interaction analysis. Results: 66 T1DM (mean age 57 ± 11.5 years, 61% male, body mass index (BMI) 26.6 ± 4.06 kg/m 2) and 290 T2DM patients (median age 61 [55.0-68.0] years, 57% male, BMI 31.7 [28.8-35.7] kg/m 2) were included. MASLD prevalence was 39% in T1DM and 83% in T2DM, with statistically significantly higher VCTE and CAP in T2DM (p < 0.001). eIS and eGDR were statistic significantly higher in T1DM compared to T2DM (p < 0.001). Waist circumference (OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.09-1.32), 1.18 (95% CI 1.08-1.29)), BMI (OR 1.59 (95% CI 1.23-2.06), 1.52 (95% CI 1.24-1.86)), and MetS (OR 3.11 (95% CI 0.73-12.23), 33.1 (95% CI 5.86-186.7)) were positively associated with MASLD in T1DM and T2DM, respectively. Better insulin sensitivity through eIS (OR 0.29 (95% CI 0.15-0.59), 0.48 (95% CI 0.29-0.79)) and eGDR (OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.52-0.90), 0.61 (95% CI 0.43-0.87)) was negatively associated with MASLD in T1DM and T2DM, respectively. Factors were adjusted for age, sex and diabetes duration. Conclusion: MASLD is less prevalent and advanced in patients with T1DM compared to patients with T2DM. Classic metabolic risk factors are associated with MASLD in both T1DM with insulin resistance and T2DM. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and analyse the onset of double diabetes. POSTER PRESENTATIONS S611 Journal of Hepatology 2026 vol. 84S1 | S69-S981
Notes: dh.richelle@student.maastrichtuniversity.nl
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49612
ISSN: 0168-8278
e-ISSN: 1600-0641
ISI #: 001797472600054
Category: M
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
xx.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version66.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.