Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49658
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLantsoght, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorChacon, Rolando-
dc.contributor.authorVEREECKEN, Eline-
dc.contributor.authorBektas, Basak-
dc.contributor.authorCatbas, Necati-
dc.contributor.authorChatzi, Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorGül, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorShirzad-Ghaleroudkhani, Nima-
dc.contributor.authorMatos, Jose-
dc.contributor.authorDang, Son-
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela, Matias-
dc.contributor.authorZandi, Kamyab-
dc.contributor.authorHajdin, Rade-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-28T13:02:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-28T13:02:03Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-07-08T05:32:06Z-
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Evaluation, 84 (7) , p. 66 -84-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/49658-
dc.description.abstractDigital twins (DTs) are increasingly seen as a promising tool for bridge management, yet bridge owners hold diverging views on bridge digital twin (BDT) requirements, benefits, and feasibility. The International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS) Working Group on Digital Twins conducted an international survey of bridge owners and reviewed current developments in DT and case studies. The survey covered owners’ management needs, DT definitions, input/output expectations, and perceived potential. Owners see promise in DTs but want clearer guidance on minimum requirements, practical benefits, and scalable implementation strategies. Case studies illustrate their strengths in lifecycle decision-making and weaknesses tied to data fragmentation. Coherent data standards, platform interoperability, and integration with existing asset management workflows are essential. This work outlines a roadmap toward a harmonized, owner-centered BDT framework grounded in coherent standards, scalable implementation paths, and cross-sectoral collaboration.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher-
dc.rights2026 American Society for Nondestructive Testing-
dc.subject.otherassessment-
dc.subject.otherexisting bridges-
dc.subject.othersurvey-
dc.subject.otherowner’s perspective-
dc.subject.otherdecision-making support-
dc.subject.otherinput data-
dc.titleDigital Twins for Bridge Management-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage84-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage66-
dc.identifier.volume84-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.32548/2026.me-04575-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.embargoEndDate2027-01-31-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorLantsoght, Eva-
item.contributorChacon, Rolando-
item.contributorVEREECKEN, Eline-
item.contributorBektas, Basak-
item.contributorCatbas, Necati-
item.contributorChatzi, Eleni-
item.contributorGül, Mustafa-
item.contributorShirzad-Ghaleroudkhani, Nima-
item.contributorMatos, Jose-
item.contributorDang, Son-
item.contributorValenzuela, Matias-
item.contributorZandi, Kamyab-
item.contributorHajdin, Rade-
item.fullcitationLantsoght, Eva; Chacon, Rolando; VEREECKEN, Eline; Bektas, Basak; Catbas, Necati; Chatzi, Eleni; Gül, Mustafa; Shirzad-Ghaleroudkhani, Nima; Matos, Jose; Dang, Son; Valenzuela, Matias; Zandi, Kamyab & Hajdin, Rade (2026) Digital Twins for Bridge Management. In: Materials Evaluation, 84 (7) , p. 66 -84.-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0025-5327-
crisitem.journal.eissn0025-5327-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2026_ASNT_Lantsoght_Digital Twins for Bridge Management_POSTPRINT.pdf
  Until 2027-01-31
Peer-reviewed author version1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
2026_ASNT_Lantsoght_Digital Twins for Bridge Management_PUBLISHED.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version3.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.