Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49752Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Greene, Michelle | - |
| dc.contributor.author | VAN RIEL, Allard | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bloemer, Josée | - |
| dc.contributor.author | STREUKENS, Sandra | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-11T13:21:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-11T13:21:13Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-07-30T08:14:09Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sustainability, 18 (Art N° 7717) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/49752 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Many innovations, including potentially highly beneficial pro-social innovations, fail to diffuse successfully at the base of the pyramid (BoP). Explanations traditionally emphasize shortcomings in the value proposition or, more recently, interpret non-adoption as a consequence of innovation resistance. This study investigates whether passive innovation resistance (PIR) among BoP consumers should be understood not merely as an individual predisposition, but also as a response shaped by characteristics of the social context. Drawing upon a service ecosystem perspective, we develop and empirically test a model linking three contextual antecedents to PIR among BoP consumers: distrust of retail, use of informal consumption practices, and limitations in resources. Survey data from 282 consumers in Zambia were used to test the model for the case of a mobile-money-related innovation. The findings demonstrate that characteristics of the social context strongly influence PIR. Beyond limitations in resources, distrust of retail and use of informal practices emerge as important antecedents, indicating that in this case, resistance to innovation in BoP settings is not solely a psychological disposition but also a context-dependent response to environmental conditions. These findings extend innovation resistance theory beyond affluent market settings by identifying important contextual antecedents of PIR. From a managerial and societal perspective, the results support the development and diffusion of pro-social innovations that are better aligned with the realities of structurally vulnerable populations, thereby contributing to poverty alleviation and sustainable development. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities doctoral grant program of the Dutch Research Council (NWO), Project number 023.010.050. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
| dc.rights | 2026bytheauthors. Licensee MDPI,Basel,Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)license. | - |
| dc.subject.other | innovation adoption | - |
| dc.subject.other | base of the pyramid | - |
| dc.subject.other | barriers | - |
| dc.subject.other | innovation resistance | - |
| dc.subject.other | context | - |
| dc.title | Fortune or Not? How Context Drives Passive Resistance to Pro-Social Innovations in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: An Empirical Study and a Research Agenda | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 18 | - |
| local.format.pages | 26 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
| dc.relation.references | References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. London, T. The Base of the Pyramid Promise: Building Businesses with Impact and Scale; Stanford Business Books; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 2016. Lashitew, A.A.; Narayan, S.; Rosca, E.; Bals, L. Creating Social Value for the ‘Base of the Pyramid’: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 2022, 178, 445–466. [CrossRef] Garrette, B.; Karnani, A. Challenges in Marketing Socially Useful Goods to the Poor. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2010, 52, 29–47. [CrossRef] Prahalad, C.K.; Hart, S.L. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Strategy Bus. 2002, 26, 54–67. Lowe, B.; Hasan, M.R.; Jose, S.V. A Conceptual Model of Pro-Poor Innovation Adoption in the BoP and Subsistence Marketplaces. In Bottom of the Pyramid Marketing: Making, Shaping and Developing BoP Markets; Singh, R., Ed.; Marketing in Emerging Markets; Emerald Publishing: Bingley, UK, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157717 Sustainability 2026, 18, 7717 23 of 26 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. Venugopal, S.; Viswanathan, M. Implementation of Social Innovations in Subsistence Marketplaces: A Facilitated Institutional Change Process Model. J. Product. Innov. Manag. 2019, 36, 800–823. [CrossRef] Pels, J.; Sheth, J.N. Serving the Invisible Poor: Segmenting the Market. J. Glob. Mark. 2021, 34, 270–281. [CrossRef] Abendroth, L.J.; Pels, J. Market Resource Gaps: Identifying Resources to Cocreate Solutions That Facilitate Consumption. Mark. Theor. 2017, 17, 357–371. [CrossRef] Ram, S.; Sheth, J.N. Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions. J. Consum. Mark. 1989, 6, 5–14. [CrossRef] Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2008, 36, 1–10. [CrossRef] Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. From Goods to Service(s): Divergences and Convergences of Logics. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2008, 37, 254–259. [CrossRef] Heidenreich, S.; Kraemer, T. Passive Innovation Resistance: The Curse of Innovation? Investigating Consequences for Innovative Consumer Behavior. J. Econ. Psychol. 2015, 51, 134–151. [CrossRef] Lemon, K.N.; Verhoef, P.C. Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 69–96. [CrossRef] Heidenreich, S.; Handrich, M. What about Passive Innovation Resistance? Investigating Adoption-Related Behavior from a Resistance Perspective: What about Passive Innovation Resistance? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2015, 32, 878–903. [CrossRef] Claudy, M.C.; Garcia, R.; O’Driscoll, A. Consumer Resistance to Innovation—A Behavioral Reasoning Perspective. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. Off. Publ. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 528–544. [CrossRef] Huang, D.; Jin, X.; Coghlan, A. Advances in Consumer Innovation Resistance Research: A Review and Research Agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 166, 120594. [CrossRef] Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005. Garcia, R.; Bardhi, F.; Friedrich, C. Overcoming Consumer Resistance to Innovation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2007, 48, 82–88. Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 11, 1–33. [CrossRef] Talke, K.; Heidenreich, S. How to Overcome Pro-Change Bias: Incorporating Passive and Active Innovation Resistance in Innovation Decision Models: Passive and Active Innovation Resistance. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2014, 31, 894–907. [CrossRef] Laukkanen, T. Consumer Adoption versus Rejection Decisions in Seemingly Similar Service Innovations: The Case of the Internet and Mobile Banking. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 2432–2439. [CrossRef] Greene, M.; Van Riel, A.C.R.; Bloemer, J.M.M. Invisible Rules: How Institutional Voids in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets Influence Adoption and Diffusion of Transformative Service Innovations. J. Serv. Mark. 2025, 39, 97–113. [CrossRef] Oreg, S. Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Differences Measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 680–693. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Koch, J.; Kraemer, T.; Heidenreich, S. Exploring Passive Innovation Resistance—An Empirical Examination of Predictors and Consequences at the Cognitive and Situational Level. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2021, 25, 2150012. [CrossRef] Labrecque, J.S.; Wood, W.; Neal, D.T.; Harrington, N. Habit Slips: When Consumers Unintentionally Resist New Products. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2017, 45, 119–133. [CrossRef] Van Tonder, E. Passive Innovation Resistance—A Conservative Consumer Perspective. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2017, 29, 642–663. [CrossRef] Hasan, R.; Lowe, B.; Petrovici, D. Consumer Adoption of Pro-Poor Service Innovations in Subsistence Marketplaces. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 121, 461–475. [CrossRef] Vargo, S.L.; Akaka, M.A.; Vaughan, C.M. Conceptualizing Value: A Service-Ecosystem View. J. Creat. Value 2017, 3, 117–124. [CrossRef] Vargo, S.L.; Maglio, P.P.; Akaka, M.A. On Value and Value Co-Creation: A Service Systems and Service Logic Perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 2008, 26, 145–152. [CrossRef] Akaka, M.A.; Vargo, S.L.; Schau, H.J. The Context of Experience. J. Serv. Manag. 2015, 26, 206–223. [CrossRef] Akaka, M.A.; Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. The Complexity of Context: A Service Ecosystems Approach for International Marketing. J. Int. Mark. 2013, 21, 1–20. [CrossRef] North, D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance; The Olitical Economy of Institutions and Decisions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1990. Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration; Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984. Vargo, S.L.; Akaka, M.A.; Wieland, H. Rethinking the Process of Diffusion in Innovation: A Service-Ecosystems and Institutional Perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 526–534. [CrossRef] Denzau, A.T.; North, D.C. Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions. Kyklos 1994, 47, 3–31. [CrossRef] Vargo, S.L.; Lusch, R.F. Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2016, 44, 5–23. Edvardsson, B.; Kleinaltenkamp, M.; Tronvoll, B.; McHugh, P.; Windahl, C. Institutional Logics Matter When Coordinating Resource Integration. Mark. Theor. 2014, 14, 291–309. [CrossRef] https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157717 Sustainability 2026, 18, 7717 24 of 26 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. Siltaloppi, J.; Wieland, H. Institutional Change in Service Ecosystems. In The SAGE Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic; Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., Eds.; SAGE: London, UK, 2018. Joncourt, S.; Gebauer, H.; Reynoso, J.; Cabrera, K.; Valdes, A.; Greve, K. Extending the Base-of-the-Pyramid Concept. Serv. Sci. 2019, 11, 241–261. [CrossRef] Prahalad, C.K. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Revised and Updated 5th Anniversary Edition: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits; FT Press: Harlow, UK, 2005. Gebauer, H.; Reynoso, J. An Agenda for Service Research at the Base of the Pyramid. J. Serv. Manag. 2013, 24, 482–502. [CrossRef] Liedong, T.A.; Peprah, A.A.; Amartey, A.O.; Rajwani, T. Institutional Voids and Firms’ Resource Commitment in Emerging Markets: A Review and Future Research Agenda. J. Int. Manag. 2020, 26, 100756. [CrossRef] Viswanathan, M.; Rosa, J.A.; Harris, J.E. Decision Making and Coping of Functionally Illiterate Consumers and Some Implications for Marketing Management. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 15–31. [CrossRef] Subrahmanyan, S.; Gomez-Arias, T. Integrated Approach to Understanding Consumer Behavior at Bottom of Pyramid. J. Consum. Mark. 2008, 25, 402–412. [CrossRef] Weidner, K.L.; Rosa, J.A.; Viswanathan, M. Marketing to Subsistence Consumers: Lessons from Practice. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 559–569. [CrossRef] Viswanathan, M.; Sridharan, S.; Ritchie, R. Understanding Consumption and Entrepreneurship in Subsistence Marketplaces. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 570–581. [CrossRef] Borchardt, M.; Ndubisi, N.O.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Grebinevych, O.; Pereira, G.M. The Evolution of Base of the Pyramid Approaches and the Role of Multinational and Domestic Business Ventures: Value-Commitment and Profit-Making Perspectives. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 89, 171–180. [CrossRef] Banerjee, A.V.; Duflo, E. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty; Public Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2011. Viswanathan, M.; Sridharan, S.; Ritchie, R. Marketing in Subsistence Marketplaces. In Alleviating Poverty Through Business Strategy; Wankel, C., Ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 209–231. London, T.; Hart, S.L. Reinventing Strategies for Emerging Markets: Beyond the Transnational Model. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2004, 35, 350–370. [CrossRef] Khanna, T.; Palepu, K.G.; Bullock, R.J. Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2010. Rivera-Santos, M.; Rufín, C. Global Village vs. Small Town: Understanding Networks at the Base of the Pyramid. Int. Bus. Rev. 2010, 19, 126–139. [CrossRef] Lewicki, R.J.; McAllister, D.J.; Bies, R.J. Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23, 438. [CrossRef] Moody, G.D.; Lowry, P.B.; Galletta, D.F. It’s Complicated: Explaining the Relationship between Trust, Distrust, and Ambivalence in Online Transaction Relationships Using Polynomial Regression Analysis and Response Surface Analysis. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2017, 26, 379–413. [CrossRef] Six, F.E.; Latusek, D. Distrust: A Critical Review Exploring a Universal Distrust Sequence. J. Trust Res. 2023, 13, 1–23. [CrossRef] Khoury, T.A.; Prasad, A. Entrepreneurship Amid Concurrent Institutional Constraints in Less Developed Countries. Bus. Soc. 2016, 55, 934–969. [CrossRef] Webb, J.W.; Kistruck, G.M.; Ireland, R.D.; Ketchen, D.J. The Entrepreneurship Process in Base of the Pyramid Markets: The Case of Multinational Enterprise/Nongovernment Organization Alliances. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2010, 34, 555–581. [CrossRef] Webb, J.W.; Khoury, T.A.; Hitt, M.A. The Influence of Formal and Informal Institutional Voids on Entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2020, 44, 504–526. [CrossRef] Greene, M.; van Riel, A.C.R. Learning from the Resourceness Blind Spot for Service Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid. J. Serv. Mark. 2021, 35, 933–946. [CrossRef] Godefroid, M.-E.; Plattfaut, R.; Niehaves, B. How to Measure the Status Quo Bias? A Review of Current Literature. Manag. Rev. Q. 2022, 73, 1667–1711. [CrossRef] Kim, H.-J.; Rha, J.-Y. Predicting the Drivers of the Intention to Use Mobile Learning in South Korea. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 2018, 12, 116–132. [CrossRef] Samuelson, W.; Zeckhauser, R. Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1988, 1, 7–59. [CrossRef] Claudy, M.C. An Empirical Investigation of Consumer Resistance to Green Product Innovation. Ph.D. Thesis, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 2011. [CrossRef] UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2023 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI); UNDP: New York, NY, USA, 2023. Bateman, M.; Duvendack, M.; Loubere, N. Is Fin-Tech the New Panacea for Poverty Alleviation and Local Development? Contesting Suri and Jack’s M-Pesa Findings Published in Science. Rev. Afr. Political Econ. 2019, 46, 480–495. [CrossRef] https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157717 Sustainability 2026, 18, 7717 25 of 26 66. Demir, A.; Pesqué-Cela, V.; Altunbas, Y.; Murinde, V. Fintech, Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality: A Quantile Regression Approach. Eur. J. Financ. 2022, 28, 86–107. [CrossRef] 67. Demirgüç-Kunt, A.; Klapper, L.; Singer, D.; Ansar, S. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. 68. Chikweche, T.; Fletcher, R. Undertaking Research at the Bottom of the Pyramid Using Qualitative Methods: From Theoretical Considerations to Practical Realities. Qual. Mark. Res. 2012, 15, 242–267. [CrossRef] 69. Ingenbleek, P.T.M.; Tessema, W.K.; Van Trijp, H.C.M. Conducting Field Research in Subsistence Markets, with an Application to Market Orientation in the Context of Ethiopian Pastoralists. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2013, 30, 83–97. [CrossRef] 70. Viswanathan, M.; Gau, R.; Chaturvedi, A. Research Methods for Subsistence Marketplaces. In Sustainability Challenges and Solutions at the Base of the Pyramid: Business, Technology and the Poor; Kandachar, P., Halme, M., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017. 71. Gau, R.; Jae, H.; Viswanathan, M. Studying Low-Literate Consumers through Experimental Methods: Implications for Subsistence Marketplaces. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1683–1691. [CrossRef] 72. Berry, J.W. Imposed ETICS—EMICS—Derived ETICS: The operationalization of a Compelling idea. Int. J. Psychol. 1989, 24, 721–735. [CrossRef] 73. 74. Berry, J.W. Emics and etics: A symbiotic conception. Cult. Psychol. 1999, 5, 165–171. [CrossRef] MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, P.M. Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies. J. Retail. 2012, 88, 542–555. [CrossRef] 75. Krosnick, J.A. Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 1991, 5, 213–236. [CrossRef] 76. 77. Roberts, C.; Gilbert, E.; Allum, N.; Eisner, L. Research Synthesis. Public Opin. Q. 2019, 83, 598–626. [CrossRef] Meisenberg, G.; Williams, A. Are Acquiescent and Extreme Response Styles Related to Low Intelligence and Education? Personal. Individ. Differ. 2008, 44, 1539–1550. [CrossRef] 78. Rammstedt, B.; Danner, D.; Bosnjak, M. Acquiescence Response Styles: A Multilevel Model Explaining Individual-Level and Country-Level Differences. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2017, 107, 190–194. [CrossRef] 79. Marjanovic, Z.; Holden, R.; Struthers, W.; Cribbie, R.; Greenglass, E. The inter-item standard deviation (ISD): An index that discriminates between conscientious and random responders. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2015, 84, 79–83. [CrossRef] 80. Arthur, W.; Hagen, E.; George, F. The Lazy or Dishonest Respondent: Detection and Prevention. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2021, 8, 105–137. [CrossRef] 81. 82. Meade, A.W.; Craig, S.B. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol. Methods 2012, 17, 437–455. [CrossRef] Streukens, S.; Leroi-Werelds, S. Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. Eur. Manag. J. 2016, 34, 618–632. [CrossRef] 83. Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Hair, J.F. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Market Research; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 587–632. 84. MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, P.M.; Jarvis, C.B. The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organiza- tional Research and Some Recommended Solutions. J. Appl. Psychol. 2005, 90, 710–730. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 85. Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2022. 86. Sahmer, K.; Hanafi, M.; El Qannari, M. Assessing Unidimensionality within PLS Path Modeling Framework. In From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization; Spiliopoulou, M., Kruse, R., Borgelt, C., Nürnberger, A., Gaul, W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 87. MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, P.M.; Podsakoff, N.P. Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques1. MIS Q. 2011, 35, 293–A5. [CrossRef] 88. Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–4. [CrossRef] 89. Cenfetelli, R.T.; Bassellier, G. Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research1. MIS Q. 2009, 33, 689–708. [CrossRef] 90. Luiz, O.R.; Mariano, E.B.; Da Silva, H.M.R. Pro-Poor Innovations to Promote Instrumental Freedoms: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13587. [CrossRef] 91. Voros Fregolente, M.; Carvalho, M.M. Exploring BoP Generations through Business Model Innovation Lens: A Review and Framing. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12817. [CrossRef] 92. Kolk, A.; Rivera-Santos, M.; Rufin, C. Reviewing a Decade of Research on the “Base/Bottom of the Pyramid” (BoP) Concept. Bus. Soc. 2014, 53, 338–377. [CrossRef] 93. Pels, J.; Mele, C. Developing Midrange Theory for Emerging Markets: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. In The Sage Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157717 Sustainability 2026, 18, 7717 26 of 26 94. Koskela-Huotari, K.; Vink, J.; Edvardsson, B. The Institutional Turn in Service Research: Taking Stock and Moving Ahead. J. Serv. Mark. 2020, 34, 373–387. [CrossRef] 95. Damschroder, L.J.; Aron, D.C.; Keith, R.E.; Kirsh, S.R.; Alexander, J.A.; Lowery, J.C. Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science. Implement. Sci. 2009, 4, 50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 96. 97. 98. Denzin, N.K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods; AldineTransaction: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2009. Boeije, H. Analysis in Qualitative Research; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2009. Ben Letaifa, S.; Reynoso, J. Toward a Service Ecosystem Perspective at the Base of the Pyramid. J. Serv. Manag. 2015, 26, 684–705. [CrossRef] 99. Banerjee, A.V.; Duflo, E. The Economic Lives of the Poor. J. Econ. Perspect. 2007, 21, 141–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 100. Beninger, S.; Robson, K. Marketing at the Base of the Pyramid: Perspectives for Practitioners and Academics. Bus. Horiz. 2015, 58, 509–516. [CrossRef] 101. Chikweche, T.; Fletcher, R. Understanding Factors That Influence Purchases in Subsistence Markets. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 643–650. [CrossRef] 102. Chikweche, T.; Stanton, J.; Fletcher, R. Family Purchase Decision Making at the Bottom of the Pyramid. J. Consum. Mark. 2012, 29, 202–213. [CrossRef] 103. Gebauer, H.; Haldimann, M.; Saul, C.J. Business Model Innovations for Overcoming Barriers in the Base-of-the-Pyramid Market. Ind. Innov. 2017, 24, 543–568. [CrossRef] 104. Hammond, A.L.; Kramer, W.J.; Katz, R.S.; Tran, J.T. The Next 4 Billion: Market Size and Business Strategy at the Base of the Pyramid. Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob. 2007, 2, 147–158. [CrossRef] 105. Jaiswal, A.K.; Gupta, S. The Influence of Marketing on Consumption Behavior at the Bottom of the Pyramid. J. Consum. Mark. 2015, 32, 113–124. [CrossRef] 106. Karnani, A. The Mirage of Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid: How the Private Sector Can Help Alleviate Poverty. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2007, 49, 90–111. [CrossRef] 107. London, T.; Esper, H.; Grogan-Kaylor, A.; Kistruck, G.M. Connecting Poverty to Purchase in Informal Markets: Connecting Poverty to Purchase. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2014, 8, 37–55. [CrossRef] 108. Pels, J.; Kidd, T. Characterizing Emerging Markets. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 2012, 3, 8–22. [CrossRef] 109. Araujo, L.; Pels, J. Marketization and Its Limits. Decision 2015, 42, 451–456. [CrossRef] 110. Sheth, J.N. Impact of Emerging Markets on Marketing: Rethinking Existing Perspectives and Practices. J. Mark. 2011, 75, 166–182. [CrossRef] | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 7717 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/su18157717 | - |
| local.provider.type | - | |
| local.uhasselt.international | yes | - |
| item.contributor | Greene, Michelle | - |
| item.contributor | VAN RIEL, Allard | - |
| item.contributor | Bloemer, Josée | - |
| item.contributor | STREUKENS, Sandra | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fullcitation | Greene, Michelle; VAN RIEL, Allard; Bloemer, Josée & STREUKENS, Sandra (2026) Fortune or Not? How Context Drives Passive Resistance to Pro-Social Innovations in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: An Empirical Study and a Research Agenda. In: Sustainability, 18 (Art N° 7717). | - |
| crisitem.journal.eissn | 2071-1050 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sustainability-18-07717.pdf | Published version | 571.64 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.