Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/7444
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiang, L.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, J.-
dc.contributor.authorROUSSEAU, Ronald-
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-20T16:16:16Z-
dc.date.available2007-12-20T16:16:16Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationScientometrics, 61(1). p. 3-18-
dc.identifier.issn0138-9130-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/7444-
dc.description.abstractStudying three Chinese major universities of different type, this article attempts to validate earlier results related to authors' name order in papers co-authored by graduate candidates and their supervisors. Candidates for the doctoral degree as well as the master's degree are considered. Defining the g-ratio as the fraction of co-authored publications where the graduate student's name precedes that of the supervisor's we obtain the following results. 1) Generally, master's level g-ratios are smaller than the corresponding doctoral level g-ratios. 2) The three doctoral g-ratio time series have a common characteristic: they tend to a limiting target value of somewhat more than 80%. The master's time series of the three universities extend themselves in parallel with the doctoral time series. 3) The g-ratio of collaborative papers related to the dissertation is higher than the g-ratio of collaborative papers not related to the dissertation. This is true on the doctoral level as well as on the master's level. 4) Different disciplines have different g-ratios, representing disciplinary customs in graduate candidate-supervisor collaboration, the highest g-ratio in the doctoral case occurring in biology (except for Tsinghua University that does not offer courses in biology). 5) There exist only small differences between the g-ratios of different kinds of universities. 6) In recent years, the same candidate-supervisor collaboration patterns exist in international publications as in domestic ones. The fact that the doctoral g-ratios of all three universities are as high as 80% reflects a universal regularity in the structure of scientific collaboration between doctoral candidates and their supervisors in China.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherKLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL-
dc.subject.otherSCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY; AUTHORS; CITATION; AGE; COLLABORATION; SCIENCE-
dc.titleName order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: a case study of three major Chinese universities-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage18-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage3-
dc.identifier.volume61-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f-
dc.identifier.isi000223177700001-
item.fullcitationLiang, L.; Liu, J. & ROUSSEAU, Ronald (2004) Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: a case study of three major Chinese universities. In: Scientometrics, 61(1). p. 3-18.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorLiang, L.-
item.contributorLiu, J.-
item.contributorROUSSEAU, Ronald-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0138-9130-
crisitem.journal.eissn1588-2861-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Page view(s)

76
checked on Jun 14, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.