Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/7444
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiang, L.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, J.-
dc.contributor.authorROUSSEAU, Ronald-
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-20T16:16:16Z-
dc.date.available2007-12-20T16:16:16Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationScientometrics, 61(1). p. 3-18-
dc.identifier.issn0138-9130-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/7444-
dc.description.abstractStudying three Chinese major universities of different type, this article attempts to validate earlier results related to authors' name order in papers co-authored by graduate candidates and their supervisors. Candidates for the doctoral degree as well as the master's degree are considered. Defining the g-ratio as the fraction of co-authored publications where the graduate student's name precedes that of the supervisor's we obtain the following results. 1) Generally, master's level g-ratios are smaller than the corresponding doctoral level g-ratios. 2) The three doctoral g-ratio time series have a common characteristic: they tend to a limiting target value of somewhat more than 80%. The master's time series of the three universities extend themselves in parallel with the doctoral time series. 3) The g-ratio of collaborative papers related to the dissertation is higher than the g-ratio of collaborative papers not related to the dissertation. This is true on the doctoral level as well as on the master's level. 4) Different disciplines have different g-ratios, representing disciplinary customs in graduate candidate-supervisor collaboration, the highest g-ratio in the doctoral case occurring in biology (except for Tsinghua University that does not offer courses in biology). 5) There exist only small differences between the g-ratios of different kinds of universities. 6) In recent years, the same candidate-supervisor collaboration patterns exist in international publications as in domestic ones. The fact that the doctoral g-ratios of all three universities are as high as 80% reflects a universal regularity in the structure of scientific collaboration between doctoral candidates and their supervisors in China.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherKLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL-
dc.subject.otherSCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY; AUTHORS; CITATION; AGE; COLLABORATION; SCIENCE-
dc.titleName order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: a case study of three major Chinese universities-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage18-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage3-
dc.identifier.volume61-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f-
dc.identifier.isi000223177700001-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.fullcitationLiang, L.; Liu, J. & ROUSSEAU, Ronald (2004) Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: a case study of three major Chinese universities. In: Scientometrics, 61(1). p. 3-18.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorLiang, L.-
item.contributorLiu, J.-
item.contributorROUSSEAU, Ronald-
crisitem.journal.issn0138-9130-
crisitem.journal.eissn1588-2861-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.