Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/8343
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLITIERE, Saskia-
dc.contributor.authorALONSO ABAD, Ariel-
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-19T15:20:55Z-
dc.date.available2008-06-19T15:20:55Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationSTATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 27(16). p. 3125-3144-
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/8343-
dc.description.abstractEstimation in generalized linear mixed models is often based on maximum likelihood theory, assuming that the underlying probability model is correctly specified. However, the validity of this assumption is sometimes difficult to verify. In this paper we study, through simulations, the impact of misspecifying the random-effects distribution on the estimation and hypothesis testing in generalized linear mixed models. It is shown that the maximum likelihood estimators are inconsistent in the presence of misspecification. The bias induced in the mean structure parameters is generally small, as far as the variability of the underlying random-effects distribution is small as well. However, the estimates of this variability are always severely biased. Given that the variance components are the only tool to study the variability of the true distribution, it is difficult to assess whether problems in the estimation of the mean structure occur. The Type I error rate and the power of the commonly used inferential procedures are also severely affected. The situation is aggravated if more than one random effect is included in the model. Further, we propose to deal with possible misspecification by way of sensitivity analysis, considering several random-effects distributions. All the results are illustrated using data from a clinical trial in schizophrenia.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support from the IAP research network # P6/03 of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy) is gratefully acknowledged.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.-
dc.subject.otherconsistency; heterogeneity model; Kullback-Leibler Information Criterion; non-normal random effects; power; type I error.-
dc.subject.otherconsistency; heterogeneity model; Kullback-Leibler information criterion; non-normal random effects; power; type I error-
dc.titleThe impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage3144-
dc.identifier.issue16-
dc.identifier.spage3125-
dc.identifier.volume27-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.3157-
dc.identifier.isi000257567900009-
item.validationecoom 2009-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorALONSO ABAD, Ariel-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.contributorLITIERE, Saskia-
item.fullcitationLITIERE, Saskia; ALONSO ABAD, Ariel & MOLENBERGHS, Geert (2008) The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models. In: STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 27(16). p. 3125-3144.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0277-6715-
crisitem.journal.eissn1097-0258-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
papercons14.pdfPeer-reviewed author version285.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
litire2007.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version211.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.