Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/8343
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | LITIERE, Saskia | - |
dc.contributor.author | ALONSO ABAD, Ariel | - |
dc.contributor.author | MOLENBERGHS, Geert | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-06-19T15:20:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-06-19T15:20:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 27(16). p. 3125-3144 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-6715 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/8343 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Estimation in generalized linear mixed models is often based on maximum likelihood theory, assuming that the underlying probability model is correctly specified. However, the validity of this assumption is sometimes difficult to verify. In this paper we study, through simulations, the impact of misspecifying the random-effects distribution on the estimation and hypothesis testing in generalized linear mixed models. It is shown that the maximum likelihood estimators are inconsistent in the presence of misspecification. The bias induced in the mean structure parameters is generally small, as far as the variability of the underlying random-effects distribution is small as well. However, the estimates of this variability are always severely biased. Given that the variance components are the only tool to study the variability of the true distribution, it is difficult to assess whether problems in the estimation of the mean structure occur. The Type I error rate and the power of the commonly used inferential procedures are also severely affected. The situation is aggravated if more than one random effect is included in the model. Further, we propose to deal with possible misspecification by way of sensitivity analysis, considering several random-effects distributions. All the results are illustrated using data from a clinical trial in schizophrenia. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | Financial support from the IAP research network # P6/03 of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy) is gratefully acknowledged. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | - |
dc.subject.other | consistency; heterogeneity model; Kullback-Leibler Information Criterion; non-normal random effects; power; type I error. | - |
dc.subject.other | consistency; heterogeneity model; Kullback-Leibler information criterion; non-normal random effects; power; type I error | - |
dc.title | The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 3144 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 16 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 3125 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcat | A1 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/sim.3157 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000257567900009 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.contributor | LITIERE, Saskia | - |
item.contributor | ALONSO ABAD, Ariel | - |
item.contributor | MOLENBERGHS, Geert | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.fullcitation | LITIERE, Saskia; ALONSO ABAD, Ariel & MOLENBERGHS, Geert (2008) The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models. In: STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 27(16). p. 3125-3144. | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2009 | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 0277-6715 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1097-0258 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
papercons14.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 285.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
litire2007.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 211.74 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
74
checked on Sep 2, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
92
checked on Apr 22, 2024
Page view(s)
62
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
286
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.