Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/9124
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGilsing, Victor-
dc.contributor.authorNooteboom, Bart-
dc.contributor.authorVANHAVERBEKE, Wim-
dc.contributor.authorDUYSTERS, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorvan den Oord, Ad-
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-12T13:25:58Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-12T13:25:58Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationRESEARCH POLICY, 37(10). p. 1717-1731-
dc.identifier.issn0048-7333-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/9124-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to understand better the innovation potential of a firm's alliance network. Here we analyze the role of an alliance network in terms of the technological distance between partners, a firm's network position (centrality)and total network density. We study how these three elements of an alliance network, separately and in combination, affect the 'twin tasks' in exploration, namely novelty creation on the one hand and its efficient absorption on the other hand. For an empirical test, we study technology-based alliance networks in the pharmaceutical, chemical and automotive industries. Our findings indicate that successful exploration indeed seems to require a delicate balance between these two exploration tasks. A second conclusion is that different network positions yield different pay-offs in terms of the number of explorative patents. In other words, success rates for exploration are not spread equally across firms. However, position alone does not tell the full story. Our empirical findings clearly indicate that exploration success also depends on the other two dimensions of embeddedness, namely technological distance and network density. The three elements of network embeddedness need to be considered jointly in order to understand their complementary effects on both novelty creation and absorptive capacity. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV-
dc.subject.otherInnovation; Interfirm collaboration; Technological exploration; Technological distance; Absorptive capacity-
dc.titleNetwork embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1731-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage1717-
dc.identifier.volume37-
local.format.pages15-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Gilsing, Victor; van den Oord, Ad] Eindhoven Univ Technol, ECIS, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands. [Gilsing, Victor; Nooteboom, Bart] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands. [Vanhaverbeke, Wim] Hasselt Univ, Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010-
dc.identifier.isi000261658700007-
item.validationecoom 2010-
item.contributorGilsing, Victor-
item.contributorNooteboom, Bart-
item.contributorVANHAVERBEKE, Wim-
item.contributorDUYSTERS, Geert-
item.contributorvan den Oord, Ad-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationGilsing, Victor; Nooteboom, Bart; VANHAVERBEKE, Wim; DUYSTERS, Geert & van den Oord, Ad (2008) Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. In: RESEARCH POLICY, 37(10). p. 1717-1731.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0048-7333-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-7625-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Network embeddedness.pdfPeer-reviewed author version584.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

426
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

623
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

2,076
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.