Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/9771
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVoets, Judith-
dc.contributor.authorSTEEN REDEKER, Erik-
dc.contributor.authorBlust, Ronny-
dc.contributor.authorBervoets, Lieven-
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-19T08:56:19Z-
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_ONE_YEAR-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationAQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 93(1). p. 53-60-
dc.identifier.issn0166-445X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/9771-
dc.description.abstractOrganisms are able to detoxify accumulated metals by, e.g. binding them to metallothionein (MT) and/or sequestering them in metal-rich granules (MRG). The different factors involved in determining the capacity or efficiency with which metals are detoxified are not yet known. In this work we studied how the sub-cellular distribution pattern of cadmium, copper and zinc in whole tissue of zebra mussels from clean and polluted surface waters is influenced by the total accumulated metal concentration and by its physiological condition. Additionally we measured the metallothionein concentration in the mussel tissue. Metal concentration increased gradually in the metal-sensitive and detoxified sub-cellular fractions with increasing whole tissue concentrations. However, metal concentrations in the sensitive fractions did not increase to the same extent as metal concentrations in whole tissues. In more polluted mussels the contribution of MRG and MT became more important. Nevertheless, metal detoxification was not sufficient to prevent metal binding to heat-sensitive low molecular weight proteins (HDP fraction). Finally we found an indication that metal detoxification was influenced by the condition of the zebra mussels. MT content could be explained for up to 83% by variations in Zn concentration and physiological condition of the mussels. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV-
dc.subject.otherZebra mussel; Fractionation; Metallothionein; Cadmium; Copper; Zinc-
dc.titleDifferences in metal sequestration between zebra mussels from clean and polluted field locations-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage60-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage53-
dc.identifier.volume93-
local.format.pages8-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Voets, Judith; Redeker, Erik Steen; Blust, Ronny; Bervoets, Lieven] Univ Antwerp, Dept Biol, Lab Ecophysiol Biochem & Toxicol, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium. [Redeker, Erik Steen] Hasselt Univ, Div Chem, Inst Mat Res, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.03.006-
dc.identifier.isi000267717800007-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationVoets, Judith; STEEN REDEKER, Erik; Blust, Ronny & Bervoets, Lieven (2009) Differences in metal sequestration between zebra mussels from clean and polluted field locations. In: AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 93(1). p. 53-60.-
item.contributorVoets, Judith-
item.contributorSTEEN REDEKER, Erik-
item.contributorBlust, Ronny-
item.contributorBervoets, Lieven-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2010-
crisitem.journal.issn0166-445X-
crisitem.journal.eissn1879-1514-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3.pdfPublished version685.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

45
checked on Feb 7, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on Jul 28, 2022

Download(s)

100
checked on Jul 28, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.