Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/9837
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHabraken, M. M. P.-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DER SCHAAF, Tjerk-
dc.contributor.authorLeistikow, I. P.-
dc.contributor.authorReijnders-Thijssen, P. M. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-31T12:19:30Z-
dc.date.available2009-08-31T12:19:30Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationERGONOMICS, 52(7). p. 809-819-
dc.identifier.issn0014-0139-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/9837-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA(TM)) in Dutch health care by means of user feedback. Thirteen HFMEA(TM) analyses of various health care processes were successfully concluded and on average took 69 person-hours (excluding reporting). These results show that HFMEA(TM) can successfully be applied in Dutch health care. However, the user feedback also uncovered several perceived drawbacks, such as the fact that HFMEA(TM) is very time-consuming and that, particularly, the risk assessment part of HFMEA(TM) is difficult to carry out. Moreover, a lack of guidance with regard to the identification of failure mode causes and effective actions might influence the quality of the outcomes of an HFMEA(TM) analysis. Several suggestions are put forward to improve the perceived utility and acceptance of HFMEA(TM). Nevertheless, future research is necessary to evaluate the actual effects of these recommendations. Error modelling and risk analysis, and their contribution to explaining human performance in socio-technical systems, traditionally belong to the field of ergonomics. The user feedback on HFMEA(TM) and the suggestions that are put forward may also be useful for (H)FMEA and hazard analysis and critical control point applications in sectors other than health care.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD-
dc.subject.otherpatient safety; system failure modelling; risk assessment and management; human reliability; human error-
dc.titleProspective risk analysis of health care processes: A systematic evaluation of the use of HFMEA (TM) in Dutch health care-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage819-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage809-
dc.identifier.volume52-
local.format.pages11-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Habraken, M. M. P.; Van der Schaaf, T. W.] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands. [Van der Schaaf, T. W.] Hasselt Univ, Hasselt, Belgium. [Leistikow, I. P.] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. [Reijnders-Thijssen, P. M. J.] MAASTRO Clin, Maastricht, Netherlands.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00140130802578563-
dc.identifier.isi000267370800004-
item.fullcitationHabraken, M. M. P.; VAN DER SCHAAF, Tjerk; Leistikow, I. P. & Reijnders-Thijssen, P. M. J. (2009) Prospective risk analysis of health care processes: A systematic evaluation of the use of HFMEA (TM) in Dutch health care. In: ERGONOMICS, 52(7). p. 809-819.-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2010-
item.contributorHabraken, M. M. P.-
item.contributorVAN DER SCHAAF, Tjerk-
item.contributorLeistikow, I. P.-
item.contributorReijnders-Thijssen, P. M. J.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0014-0139-
crisitem.journal.eissn1366-5847-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

55
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

62
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

240
checked on Jun 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.