Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/9858
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorVan Huylenbroeck, Guido-
dc.contributor.authorLauwers, Ludwig-
dc.contributor.authorMathijs, Erik-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-08T10:41:27Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-08T10:41:27Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 90(10). p. 3057-3069-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/9858-
dc.description.abstractAppropriate assessment of firm sustainability facilitates actor-driven processes towards sustainable development. The methodology in this paper builds further on two proven methodologies for the assessment of sustainability performance: it combines the sustainable value approach with frontier efficiency benchmarks. The sustainable value methodology tries to relate firm performance to the use of different resources. This approach assesses contributions to corporate sustainability by comparing firm resource productivity with the resource productivity of a benchmark, and this for all resources considered. The efficiency is calculated by estimating the production frontier indicating the maximum feasible production possibilities. In this research, the sustainable value approach is combined with efficiency analysis methods to benchmark sustainability assessment. In this way, the production theoretical underpinnings of efficiency analysis enrich the sustainable value approach. The methodology is presented using two different functional forms: the Cobb-Douglas and the translog functional forms. The simplicity of the Cobb-Douglas functional form as benchmark is very attractive but it lacks flexibility. The translog functional form is more flexible but has the disadvantage that it requires a lot of data to avoid estimation problems. Using frontier methods for deriving firm specific benchmarks has the advantage that the particular situation of each company is taken into account when assessing sustainability. Finally, we showed that the methodology can be used as an integrative sustainability assessment tool for policy measures. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.subject.otherSustainability performance; Sustainable value; Efficiency; Performance assessment; Frontier method; Benchmarks-
dc.titleSustainable value assessment of farms using frontier efficiency benchmarks-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage3069-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage3057-
dc.identifier.volume90-
local.format.pages13-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Van Passel, Steven] Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Van Huylenbroeck, Guido] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, Ghent, Belgium. [Mathijs, Erik] Catholic Univ Louvain, Div Agr & Food Econ, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium. [Lauwers, Ludwig] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res, Social Sci Unit, Merelbeke, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.009-
dc.identifier.isi000269022800013-
item.validationecoom 2010-
item.fullcitationVAN PASSEL, Steven; Van Huylenbroeck, Guido; Lauwers, Ludwig & Mathijs, Erik (2009) Sustainable value assessment of farms using frontier efficiency benchmarks. In: JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 90(10). p. 3057-3069.-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorVan Huylenbroeck, Guido-
item.contributorLauwers, Ludwig-
item.contributorMathijs, Erik-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0301-4797-
crisitem.journal.eissn1095-8630-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
handle-new3.pdfPublished version429.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

47
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

61
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

44
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

294
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.