Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/10873
Title: Evaluation of Chromogenic Media for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Authors: Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi
CORTINAS ABRAHANTES, Jose 
Sabiiti, Wilber
Lammens, Christine
Vercauteren, Greetje
Ieven, Margareta
MOLENBERGHS, Geert 
AERTS, Marc 
Goossens, Herman
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 48(4). p. 1040-1046
Abstract: Rapid laboratory diagnosis is critical for treating, managing, and preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We evaluated and compared the potential for MRSA detection of five chromogenic media, Brilliance MRSA agar (Oxoid), ChromID (bioMerieux), MRSASelect (Bio-Rad), CHROMagar (CHROMagar Microbiology), and BBL-CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics). Media were tested with log serial dilutions (100 to 106 CFU) of pure isolates of MRSA (n = 60), non-MRSA (n = 27), and defined mixtures thereof simulating clinical samples (n = 84). Further evaluations were done on pre-enriched nasal and groin screening swabs (n = 213) from 165 hospitalized patients. Randomized samples were spiral plated on each medium and independently scored by five investigators for characteristic colonies at 24 and 48 h of incubation. Confirmatory testing of up to five putative MRSA colonies recovered from each medium was done. The cumulative average sensitivity with isolates, mixtures, and clinical samples was the highest for Brilliance MRSA agar (97%) and similar for the other four media (>= 92%). The cumulative average specificity was the highest for BBL-CHROMagar (99%), followed by MRSASelect (98%), CHROMagar (97%), ChromID (89%), and Brilliance MRSA agar (86%). All of the media detected MRSA at 10 and 1 CFU, although at these low loads, few MRSA samples harboring SCCmec type III or IV were misinterpreted as non-MRSA by investigators. False-positive results were mainly due to methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. For an arbitrary MRSA prevalence of 5% and based on patient sample evaluations, the positive predictive values for BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar (similar to 84%) were the highest. The negative predictive values of all of the media were >= 92% for MRSA prevalences ranging from 5% to 30%. In conclusion, BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar gave the best overall results for detection of MRSA, irrespective of the sample concentration, investigator, or incubation period.
Notes: [Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi; Sabiiti, Wilber; Lammens, Christine; Vercauteren, Greetje; Ieven, Margareta; Goossens, Herman] Univ Antwerp, Dept Med Microbiol, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. [Abrahantes, Jose Cortinas; Molenberghs, Geert; Aerts, Marc] Hasselt Univ, Ctr Stat, Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Ieven, Margareta; Goossens, Herman] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Antwerp, Belgium. surbhi.malhotra@ua.ac.be
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/10873
ISSN: 0095-1137
e-ISSN: 1098-660X
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01745-09
ISI #: 000276153200004
Rights: © 2010, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2011
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
evaluation of chromogenic media.pdfPublished version912.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

49
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

50
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

66
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

82
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.