Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Design Archetypes for Phase 2 Clinical Trials in Central Nervous System Disorders||Authors:||Mallinckrodt, Craig H.
Detke, Michael J.
Prucka, William R.
Ruberg, Stephen J.
|Issue Date:||2010||Publisher:||DRUG INFORMATION ASSOC||Source:||DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 44(4). p. 421-430||Abstract:||An overarching framework is proposed to guide the design of phase 2 studies in central nervous system disorders. Archetypes are considered for scenarios where dose response is highly relevant in clinical practice, as in the symptomatic treatment of acute disorders. Archetypes for scenarios where dose response is less relevant, as in disease modification for neurodegenerative disorders, are beyond the scope of this article. Primary design archetypes are determined by axes of development that are defined by optimism for success (probability of efficacy) and signal detection (magnitude of the anticipated effect size). The fast-to-registration primary archetype uses a dose-response study as the first efficacy, that is, proof of concept (PoC), study and is appropriate when the prospects for signal detection and the optimism for efficacy are higher. These conditions may exist when the anticipated effect size is large and when either testing a drug with a proven mechanism of action or when a favorable biomarker result was obtained in phase 1. The fast-to-PoC primary archetype tests one dose arm to establish PoC before assessing dose response and is appropriate when the optimism for efficacy and the prospects for signal detection are lower. These conditions may exist when testing a drug with a novel mechanism and/or the anticipated effect size is smaller. Secondary archetypes are used to mitigate the trade-offs between the quick-kill fast-to-PoC approach and the quick-win fast-to-registration approach, and are key areas where adaptive designs can be beneficial.||Notes:||[Mallinckrodt, Craig H.; Prucka, William R.; Ruberg, Stephen J.] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA. [Detke, Michael J.] MedAvante Res Inst, Hamilton, NJ USA. [Detke, Michael J.] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA. [Detke, Michael J.] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA. [Detke, Michael J.] McLean Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Belmont, MA 02178 USA. [Molenberghs, Geert] Hasselt Univ, Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Molenberghs, Geert] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. email@example.com||Keywords:||Clinical trial; Phase 2; Clinical trial design;clinical trial; phase 2; clinical trial design||Document URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/1942/11038||Link to publication:||https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254087862_Design_Archetypes_for_Phase_2_Clinical_Trials_in_Central_Nervous_System_Disorders||ISSN:||0092-8615||DOI:||10.1177/009286151004400406||ISI #:||000279705600006||Rights:||(C) 2010 Drug Information Association, Inc.||Category:||A1||Type:||Journal Contribution||Validations:||ecoom 2011|
|Appears in Collections:||Research publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Design_archetypes_V6.pdf||Peer-reviewed author version||98.5 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Published version||10.68 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open Request a copy|
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 21, 2022
checked on May 25, 2022
checked on May 25, 2022
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.