Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/12819
Title: Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: Non-Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging versus Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging-Value in Detection
Authors: De Foer, Bert
Vercruysse, Jean-Philippe
Bernaerts, Anja
Meersschaert, Joke
Kenis, Christoph
Pouillon, Marc
De Beuckeleer, Luc
Michiels, Johan
BOGAERTS, Kris 
Deckers, Filip
Somers, Thomas
Hermans, Robert
Offeciers, Erwin
Casselman, Jan W.
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
Source: RADIOLOGY, 255(3), p. 866-872
Abstract: Purpose: To retrospectively compare non-echo-planar (non-EP) diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and the combination of both techniques in the evaluation of patients with cholesteatoma. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board-approved study, for which the need to obtain informed consent was waived, included 57 patients clinically suspected of having a middle ear cholesteatoma without a history of surgery and 63 patients imaged before "second-look" surgery. Four blinded radiologists evaluated three sets of MR images: a set of delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, a set of non-EP DW images, and a set of both kinds of images. Overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV), as well as intra- and inter-observer agreement, were assessed and compared among methods. To correct for the correlation between different readings, a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model was fitted. Results were compared with surgical results, which were regarded as the standard of reference. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were significantly different between the three methods (P<.005). Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 56.7% and 67.6% with the delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images and 82.6% and 87.2% with the non-EP DW images. Sensitivity for the combination of both kinds of images was 84.2%, while specificity was 88.2%. The overall PPV was 88.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 96.0% for non-EP DW images, and 96.3% for the combination of both kinds of images. The overall NPV was 27.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 56.5% for non-EP DW images, and 59.6% for the combination of both kinds of images. Conclusion: MR imaging for detection of middle ear cholesteatoma can be performed by using non-EP DW imaging sequences alone. Use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence combined with a delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequence yielded no significant increases in sensitivity, specificity, NPV, or PPV over the use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence alone. (c) RSNA, 2010
Notes: [De Foer, B; Bernaerts, A; Kenis, C; Pouillon, M; De Beuckeleer, L; Deckers, F; Casselman, JW] Sint Augustinus Hosp, Dept Radiol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. [Vercruysse, JP; Somers, T; Offeciers, E] Sint Augustinus Hosp, Univ Dept ENT, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. [Casselman, JW] Sint Jan Hosp AV, Dept Radiol, Brugge, Belgium. [Meersschaert, J; Hermans, R] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Louvain, Belgium. [Bogaerts, K] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Louvain, Belgium. [Bogaerts, K] Univ Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. [Michiels, J] Siemens NV, Healthcare Sector, Brussels, Belgium.
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/12819
ISSN: 0033-8419
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091140
ISI #: 000278038500026
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2011
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
866.full.pdfPublished version804.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

88
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

88
checked on May 1, 2024

Page view(s)

82
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

124
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.