Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1571
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVERBEKE, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorFIEUWS, Steffen-
dc.contributor.authorLESAFFRE, Emmanuel-
dc.contributor.authorKato, B.S.-
dc.contributor.authorForeman, M.D.-
dc.contributor.authorBroos, P.L.O.-
dc.contributor.authorMilisen, Koen-
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-01T12:26:16Z-
dc.date.available2007-06-01T12:26:16Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 55(1). p. 93-101-
dc.identifier.issn0035-9254-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/1571-
dc.description.abstractThe main advantage of longitudinal studies is that they can distinguish changes over time within individuals (longitudinal effects) from differences between subjects at the start of the study (base-line characteristics; cross-sectional effects). Often, especially in observational studies, subjects are very heterogeneous at base-line, and one may want to correct for this, when doing inferences for the longitudinal trends. Three procedures for base-line correction are compared in the context of linear mixed models for continuous longitudinal data. All procedures are illustrated extensively by using data from an experiment which aimed at studying the relationship between the post-operative evolution of the functional status of elderly hip fracture patients and their preoperative neurocognitive status.-
dc.format.extent114845 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherbase-line correction; linear mixed model; longitudinal data; longitudinal trends; EFFECTS MODELS-
dc.titleA comparison of procedures to correct for base-line differences in the analysis of continuous longitudinal data: a case-study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage101-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage93-
dc.identifier.volume55-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00531.x-
dc.identifier.isi000235710800007-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationVERBEKE, Geert; FIEUWS, Steffen; LESAFFRE, Emmanuel; Kato, B.S.; Foreman, M.D.; Broos, P.L.O. & Milisen, Koen (2006) A comparison of procedures to correct for base-line differences in the analysis of continuous longitudinal data: a case-study. In: JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 55(1). p. 93-101.-
item.contributorVERBEKE, Geert-
item.contributorFIEUWS, Steffen-
item.contributorLESAFFRE, Emmanuel-
item.contributorKato, B.S.-
item.contributorForeman, M.D.-
item.contributorBroos, P.L.O.-
item.contributorMilisen, Koen-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0035-9254-
crisitem.journal.eissn1467-9876-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
j.1467-9876.2005.00531.pdfPeer-reviewed author version112.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on May 14, 2024

Page view(s)

104
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

224
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.