Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1613
Title: | Hip and non-spine fracture risk reductions differ among antiresorptive agents: Evidence from randomised controlled trials. | Authors: | Liberman, U. Hochberg, M. GEUSENS, Piet Shah, A. Lin, Jie Chattopadhyay, A. Ross, P. |
Issue Date: | 2006 | Publisher: | Blackwell | Source: | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 60(11). p. 1394-1400 | Abstract: | A number of antiresorptive agents reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, but few have shown consistent effects on hip and other non-spine fractures. Meta-analysis provides a more precise estimate than individual trials when results are consistent across pooled trials. Earlier meta-analyses summarised the results for vertebral and non-spine fractures. New data have emerged for hormone therapy (HT), alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS) and ibandronate (IBN). We surveyed recent reports of randomised, placebo-controlled trials with non-spine and/or hip fracture data, and used meta-analysis where appropriate to test for heterogeneity and derive pooled estimates. The magnitude of effect on hip fracture appears to be similar to that for non-spine fracture for each drug, but differs among drugs. Based on the current data, ALN reduces the risk of hip and non-spine fracture by 49–55%, HT by 25–36% and RIS by 26–27%. There is insufficient and/or inconsistent evidence of an effect on these fractures for IBN, calcitonin and raloxifene. | Keywords: | osteoporosis; antiresorptive therapy; fracture; alendronate; risedronate; ibandronate; raloxifene; hormone therapy | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1613 | ISSN: | 1368-5031 | e-ISSN: | 1742-1241 | DOI: | 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01148.x | ISI #: | 000241190700012 | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2007 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.