Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/17969
Title: Cost-effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women, health care workers and persons with underlying illnesses in Belgium
Authors: Blommaert, Adriaan
Bilcke, Joke
VANDENDIJCK, Yannick 
Hanquet, Germaine
HENS, Niel 
Beutels, Philippe
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source: VACCINE, 32 (46), p. 6075-6083
Abstract: Risk groups with increased vulnerability for influenza complications such as pregnant women, persons with underlying illnesses as well as persons who come into contact with them, such as health care workers, are currently given priority (along with other classic target groups) to receive seasonal influenza vaccination in Belgium. We aimed to evaluate this policy from a health care payer perspective by cost-effectiveness analysis in the three specific target groups above, while accounting for effects beyond the target group. Increasing the coverage of influenza vaccination is likely to be cost-effective for pregnant women (median (sic)6589 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained [(sic)4073-(sic)10,249]) and health care workers (median (sic)24,096/QALY gained [(sic)16,442-(sic)36,342]), if this can be achieved without incurring additional administration costs. Assuming an additional physician's consult is charged to administer each additional vaccine dose, the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating pregnant women depends strongly on the extent of its impact on the neonate's health. For health care workers, the assumed number of preventable secondary infections has a strong influence on the cost-effectiveness. Vaccinating people with underlying illnesses is likely highly cost-effective above 50 years of age and borderline cost-effective for younger persons, depending on relative life expectancy and vaccine efficacy in this risk group compared to the general population. The case-fatality ratios of the target group, of the secondary affected groups and vaccine efficacy are key sources of uncertainty. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes: [Blommaert, Adriaan; Bilcke, Joke; Hens, Niel; Beutels, Philippe] Univ Antwerp, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst VAXINFECTIO, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Modelling Infect Dis, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium. [Blommaert, Adriaan; Vandendijck, Yannick; Hens, Niel] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat Bioinfo, Hasselt, Belgium. [Hanquet, Germaine] Belgian Hlth Care Knowledge Ctr KCE, Brussels, Belgium. [Beutels, Philippe] Univ New S Wales, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Keywords: flu; vaccination; risk groups; cost-utility; pregnancy; immunocompromised; elderly;Flu; Vaccination; Risk groups; Cost-utility; Pregnancy; Immunocompromised; Elderly
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/17969
ISSN: 0264-410X
e-ISSN: 1873-2518
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.085
ISI #: 000343845300009
Rights: © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2015
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
blommaert 1.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version730.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
CEA influenza risk groups 2014.pdfPeer-reviewed author version814.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Page view(s)

108
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

358
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.