Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/19002
Title: Dose specification for Ir-192 high dose rate brachytherapy in terms of dose-to-water-in-medium and dose-to-medium-in-medium
Authors: Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson
RENIERS, Brigitte 
Nilsson, Josef
Persson, Maria
Yoriyaz, Helio
Verhaegen, Frank
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: IOP PUBLISHING LTD
Source: PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 60 (11), p. 4565-4579
Abstract: Dose calculation in high dose rate brachytherapy with Ir-192 is usually based on the TG-43U1 protocol where all media are considered to be water. Several dose calculation algorithms have been developed that are capable of handling heterogeneities with two possibilities to report dose: dose-to-medium-inmedium (D-m,D-m) and dose-to-water-in-medium (D-w,D-m). The relation between D-m,D-m and D-w,D-m for Ir-192 is the main goal of this study, in particular the dependence of D-w,D-m on the dose calculation approach using either large cavity theory (LCT) or small cavity theory (SCT). A head and neck case was selected due to the presence of media with a large range of atomic numbers relevant to tissues and mass densities such as air, soft tissues and bone interfaces. This case was simulated using a Monte Carlo (MC) code to score: D-m,D-m, D-w,D-m (LCT), mean photon energy and photon fluence. D-w,D-m (SCT) was derived from MC simulations using the ratio between the unrestricted collisional stopping power of the actual medium and water. Differences between D-m,D-m and D-w,D-m (SCT or LCT) can be negligible (<1%) for some tissues e.g. muscle and significant for other tissues with differences of up to 14% for bone. Using SCT or LCT approaches leads to differences between D-w,D-m (SCT) and D-w,D-m (LCT) up to 29% for bone and 36% for teeth. The mean photon energy distribution ranges from 222 keV up to 356 keV. However, results obtained using mean photon energies are not equivalent to the ones obtained using the full, local photon spectrum. This work concludes that it is essential that brachytherapy studies clearly report the dose quantity. It further shows that while differences between D-m,D-m and D-w,D-m (SCT) mainly depend on tissue type, differences between D-m,D-m and D-w,D-m (LCT) are, in addition, significantly dependent on the local photon energy fluence spectrum which varies with distance to implanted sources.
Notes: [Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva; Yoriyaz, Helio] IPEN CNEN SP, Sao Paulo, Brazil. [Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva; Reniers, Brigitte; Verhaegen, Frank] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Dept Radiat Oncol MAASTRO, NL-6201 BN Maastricht, Netherlands. [Tedgren, Asa Carlsson; Nilsson, Josef; Persson, Maria] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Sect Radiotherapy Phys & Engn, Stockholm, Sweden. [Tedgren, Asa Carlsson] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci IMH, Med Radiat Phys, Linkoping, Sweden. [Reniers, Brigitte] Hasselt Univ, CMK, Res Grp NuTeC, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Verhaegen, Frank] McGill Univ, Dept Oncol, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada.
Keywords: brachytherapy; 192Ir; dose-to-water-in-medium; dose-to-medium-in-medium;brachytherapy; Ir-192; dose-to-water-in-medium; dose-to-medium-in-medium
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/19002
ISSN: 0031-9155
e-ISSN: 1361-6560
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/11/4565
ISI #: 000355210600023
Rights: © 2015 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2016
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0031-9155_60_11_4565.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Sep 5, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

132
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

110
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.