Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1964
Title: Differing effects on hip and nonspine fracture risk reduction among N-containing bisphosphonates: Review and meta-analysis
Authors: Liberman, UA
Hochberg, MC
GEUSENS, Piet 
Ross, PD
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: SPRINGER LONDON LTD
Source: OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 17. p. S222-S223
Abstract: Objectives: N-containing bisphosphonates reduce the risk of vertebral fractures (VFx): however, results have not shown consistent effects on hip and other nonspine fractures. Systematic reviews are useful to summarize effects that often vary among individual trials, and meta-analysis provides a more precise estimate when results are consistent across pooled trials.(1) Methods: We surveyed earlier systematic reviews and meta-analyses ogether with subsequent reports (2-4) of randomized, placebo-controlled trials with data on nonspine and/or hip fractures, and used meta-analysis where appropriate to test for heterogeneity and derive pooled estimates. Results: For risedronate (RIS) (n=12958 subjects in trials), the relative risk (RR) reduction was 27% for nonspine fracture (RR=0.73; 95% CI= 0.61, 0.87)1 and 26% for hip fracture (RR=0.74; 0.58, 0.94); there was no significant interaction of treatment and age >80 and there was no heterogeneity by dose (2.5 or 5 mg/day). For alendronate (ALN), heterogeneity existed; doses >10 mg/day were significantly more effective for reduction of nonspine and hip fracture. The RR reduction with ALN >10 mg (n=3723) was 49% for nonspine fractures (RR=0.51; 0.38, 0.69).1 The RR reduction for hip fracture was 55% (RR=0.45; 0.28, 0.71) when osteoporotic women in FIT (ALN 5 mg/day in years 1–2 then 10 mg/day for remainder of trial) were included (n=6804), and 55% (RR=0.45; 0.18, 1.13) for doses >10 mg/day (n=3723).1 One post-hoc analysis suggested an effect of ibandronate (IBN) on non-spine fractures in patients with severe osteoporosis, but the limited fracture data and differences in dosing precluded pooling studies for meta-analysis. No data are available on the effect of IBN on hip fracture. Consequently, there is no consistent evidence of hip or nonspine fracture risk reduction available for meta-analysis. No data are available on the effect of IBN on hip fracture. Consequently, there is no consistent evidence of hip or nonspine fracture risk reduction available for meta-analysis with IBN at a dose of 2.5 mg/day.(4) Conclusions: The magnitude of effect on hip fracture appears to differ among drugs. Based on current data, ALN reduces the risk of hip and nonspine fracture by 49–55% and RIS by 26–27%. There is insufficient and/or inconsistent evidence of an effect on these fractures for ibandronate.(4) 1. Cranney et al. Endocr Rev 2002;23:570–8. 2. Papapoulos Osteoporos Int 2005;16:468–74. 3. McClung et al. NEJM 2001;344:333–40. 4. Chesnut et al. JBMR 2004;19:1241–9.
Notes: Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Felsenstein Med Res Ctr, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel. Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA. Limburgs Univ Ctr, Biomed Res Inst, Diepenbeek, Belgium. Limburgs Univ Ctr, Biomed Res Inst, Maastricht, Netherlands. Merck & Co Inc, Merck Res Labs, Rahway, NJ 07065 USA.
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1964
ISSN: 0937-941X
e-ISSN: 1433-2965
ISI #: 000245980600294
Category: M
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Jul 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.