Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21880
Title: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Patient-related factors determining image quality using a second-generation 320-slice CT scanner
Authors: GHEKIERE, Olivier 
Nchimi, Alain
Djekic, Julien
El Hachemi, Mounia
Mancini, Isabelle
HANSEN, Dominique 
Vanhoenacker, Piet
de Roos, Albert
DENDALE, Paul 
Issue Date: 2016
Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 221, p. 970-976
Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic confidence of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and the effect of patient-related factors on CCTA image quality using a second-generation 320-slice scanner. Methods and results: 200 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 12 years; 109 men) prospectively underwent CCTA. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.1 ± 4.9 kg/m2; the median heart rate (HR) was 60.0 (interquartile range (IQR), 53.9–66.1) beats per minute (bpm). The median segment's diameter was 2.8 (IQR, 2.2–3.4) mm. For each coronary segment ≥1.5 mm in diameter, two readers scored: diameter narrowing as b or ≥50%, overall diagnostic confidence and motion-related image quality, with interobserver agreement kappa-values of 0.89, 0.91 and 0.61 respectively. Seventy-nine of the 2505 evaluated segments (3.2%) had non-diagnostic image quality because of coronary calcifications (66/79; 83.5%), stent- (6/79; 7.5%), pacemaker- (2/79; 2.5%) or motionrelated artifacts (5/79; 6.5%). The effect of patient-related factors on motion-related image quality was investigated by multinomial logistic regression in 181 patients with calcium score (IQR, 0–446.5). Increasing coronary diameter was the most improving image quality factor (odds ratio (OR), 1.8637; p b 0.001), marginally followed by lower HR (OR, 0.9547; p b 0.001) and calcium score (OR, 0.9997; p = 0.04). Gender (p = 0.70), age (p = 0.24) and BMI (p = 0.45) did not affect image quality. Conclusion: Using a second-generation 320-slice scanner, CCTA diagnostic confidence is predominantly affected by coronary calcifications, whereas motion-related image quality is non-diagnostic only in exceptional cases and mainly influenced by the coronary diameter. For future developments, our study findings therefore suggest greater requirements concerning spatial resolution and calcium-related artifact removal than concerning temporal resolution, especially to improve diagnostic confidence in patient groups with smaller coronary diameters.
Notes: Ghekiere, O (reprint author), CHC, Dept Radiol, Rue Hesbaye 75, B-4000 Liege, Belgium. olivierghekiere@gmail.com
Keywords: image quality; coronary diameter; patient-related factors; coronary calcifications; coronary CT angiography; diagnostic confidence
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21880
ISSN: 0167-5273
e-ISSN: 1874-1754
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.141
ISI #: 000384692600183
Rights: © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2017
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ghekiere et al. Int J Cardiol 2016.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

72
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

46
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.