Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/24084
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorECTORS, Wim-
dc.contributor.authorKOCHAN, Bruno-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Davy-
dc.contributor.authorBELLEMANS, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorWETS, Geert-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-04T13:57:23Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-04T13:57:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationProcedia Computer Science, Elsevier,p. 225-232-
dc.identifier.issn1877-0509-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/24084-
dc.description.abstractModeling people's behavior in e.g. travel demand models is an extremely complex, multidimensional process. However, the frequency of occurrence of day-long activity schedules obeys a ubiquitous power law distribution, commonly referred to as Zipf's law.1 This paper discusses the role of aggregation within the phenomenon of Zipf's law in activity schedules. Aggregation is analyzed in two dimensions: activity type encoding and the aggregation of individual data in the dataset. This research employs four datasets: the household travel survey (HTS) NHTS 2009, two six-week travel surveys (MobiDrive 1999 and Thurgau 2003) and a 24-week set of trip data which was donated by one individual. Maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) and the Kolmogorov- Smirnov (KS) goodness-of-fit (GOF) statistic are used in the “PoweRlaw” R package to reliably fit a power law. To analyze the effect of aggregation in the first dimension, the activity type encoding, five different activity encoding aggregation levels were created in the NHTS 2009 dataset, each aggregating the activity types somewhat differently. To analyze aggregation in the second dimension, the analysis moves from study area-wide aggregated data to subsets of the data, and finally to individual (longitudinal) data.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.-
dc.subject.otherZipf; power law; activity schedules; data aggregation; activity type classes-
dc.titleZipf’s power law in activity schedules and the effect of aggregation-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate16-19 May 2017-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename8th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT-2017)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceMadeira, Portugal-
dc.identifier.epage232-
dc.identifier.spage225-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
dc.description.notesEctors, W (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Transportat Res Inst IMOB, Agoralaan, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. wim.ectors@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.relation.ispartofseriesnr109C-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.336-
dc.identifier.isi000414533000028-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProcedia Computer Science-
item.validationecoom 2018-
item.contributorECTORS, Wim-
item.contributorKOCHAN, Bruno-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Davy-
item.contributorBELLEMANS, Tom-
item.contributorWETS, Geert-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationECTORS, Wim; KOCHAN, Bruno; JANSSENS, Davy; BELLEMANS, Tom & WETS, Geert (2017) Zipf’s power law in activity schedules and the effect of aggregation. In: Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier,p. 225-232.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ectors et al._ANT2017_openAccess (1).pdfPublished version1.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

116
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Download(s)

232
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.