Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25953
Title: Physiotherapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis across Europe: Regions and other factors that matter
Authors: Martinková, Patrícia
Freeman, Jenny
Drabinová, Adéla
Erosheva, Elena
Cattaneo, Davide
Jonsdottir, Johanna
BAERT, Ilse 
Smedal, Tori
Romberg, Anders
FEYS, Peter 
Alves-Guerreiro, Jose
Habek, Mario
Henze, Thomas
Santoyo Medina, Carme
Beiske, Antonie
VAN ASCH, Paul 
Bakalidou, Daphne
Salcı, Yeliz
Nikolikj Dimitrova, Erieta
Pavlíková, Markéta
Řasová, Kamila
Issue Date: 2018
Source: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 22, p. 59-67
Abstract: Background A wide variety of interventions exists in physical therapy (PT), but knowledge about their use across different geographical regions is limited. This study investigated the use of PT interventions in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) across Europe. It aimed to determine whether regions differ in applying interventions, and explore whether factors other than regions play a role in their use. Methods In an online cross-sectional survey, 212 respondents from 115 European workplaces providing PT services to people with MS representing 26 countries (four European regions) participated. Cluster analysis, Pearson Chi-squared test and a Poisson regression model were used to analyze the data. Results Thirteen of 45 listed PT interventions were used by more than 75% of centers, while nine interventions were used by less than 25%. For 12 interventions, regions differed markedly in their use. Cluster analysis of centers identified four clusters similar in their intervention use. Cluster assignment did not fully align with regions. While center region was important, center size, number and gender of physical therapists working in the center, and time since qualification also played a role. Cluster analysis exploring the use of the interventions provided the basis for a categorization of PT interventions in line with their primary focus: 1. Physical activity (fitness/endurance/resistance) training; 2. Neuroproprioceptive “facilitation/inhibition”; 3. Motor/skill acquisition (individualized therapy led); 4. Technology based interventions. Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first study that has explored this topic in MS. The results broaden our understanding of the different PT interventions used in MS, as well as the context of their use.
Notes: Martinkova, P (reprint author, Czech Acad Sci, Inst Comp Sci, Dept Stat Modelling, Pod Vodarenskou Vezi 2, Prague 19207 8, Czech Republic. martinkova@cs.cas.cz; jenny.freeman@plymouth.ac.uk; drabinova@cs.cas.cz; erosheva@uw.edu; dcattaneo@dongnocchi.it; jjonsdottir@dongnocchi.it; ilse.baert@uhasselt.be; tori.smedal@helse-bergen.no; anders.romberg@neuroliitto.fi; Peter.Feys@uhasselt.be; jose.guerreiro@ipleiria.pt; mhabek@mef.hr; thomas.henze@outlook.com; csantoyo@cem-cat.org; agbeiske@gmail.com; paulvanasch@yahoo.com; dafbak@otenet.gr; fztyeliz@hotmail.com; erietand@yahoo.com; pavlikova@biostatisticka.cz; kamila.rasova@gmail.com
Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; Physical therapy; Physiotherapeutic interventions; Europe; Questionnaire survey; Cluster analysis
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25953
ISSN: 2211-0348
e-ISSN: 2211-0356
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.03.005
ISI #: 000433294800014
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2019
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Martinkova Rasova Physiotherapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis MSARD 2018.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on Aug 31, 2022

Download(s)

42
checked on Aug 31, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.