Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27609
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | DINGENEN, Bart | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barton, Christian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Janssen, Tessa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Benoit, Anke | - |
dc.contributor.author | Malliaras, Peter | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-18T14:54:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-18T14:54:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 33, p. 40-47 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1466-853X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27609 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To examine test-retest reliability of two-dimensional measured frontal and sagittal plane kinematics during running, and to determine how many steps to include to reach and maintain a stable mean. Design: Reliability study. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Twenty-one recreational runners. Main outcome measures: Lateral trunk position, contralateral pelvic drop, femoral adduction, hip adduction, knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion during midstance, and foot and tibia inclination at initial contact were measured with two-dimensional video analysis during running for 10 consecutive steps for both legs. All participants were tested twice one week apart. A sequential estimation method was used to determine the number of steps needed to reach a stable mean. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and smallest detectable differences (SDD) were calculated. Results: The minimal number of steps was 6.3 ± 0.3. Lateral trunk position, femoral adduction and foot inclination showed excellent reliability (ICC 0.90e0.99; SDD 1.3 e2.3 ). Tibia inclination and ankle dorsiflexion showed good to excellent reliability (ICC 0.73e0.92; SDD 2.2 e4.8 ). Hip adduction and knee flexion showed good reliability (ICC 0.82e0.89; SDD 2.3 e3.8 ). Contralateral pelvic drop showed moderate to good reliability (ICC 0.59e0.77; SDD 2.7 e2.8 ). Conclusion: Two-dimensional video analysis is reliable to assess running kinematics on different days. The mean of at least 7 steps should be included. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.other | Running; Kinematics; Two-dimensional video analysis; Reliability | - |
dc.title | Test-retest reliability of two-dimensional video analysis during running | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 47 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 40 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.06.009 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000445981100008 | - |
item.fullcitation | DINGENEN, Bart; Barton, Christian; Janssen, Tessa; Benoit, Anke & Malliaras, Peter (2018) Test-retest reliability of two-dimensional video analysis during running. In: PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 33, p. 40-47. | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.contributor | DINGENEN, Bart | - |
item.contributor | Barton, Christian | - |
item.contributor | Janssen, Tessa | - |
item.contributor | Benoit, Anke | - |
item.contributor | Malliaras, Peter | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2019 | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 1466-853X | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Accepted Manuscript.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 407.6 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Figure 1.jpeg | Supplementary material | 780.51 kB | JPEG | View/Open |
Figure 2.jpeg | Supplementary material | 816.51 kB | JPEG | View/Open |
Figure 3.jpg | Supplementary material | 255.76 kB | JPEG | View/Open |
TABLE 1.docx | Supplementary material | 13.52 kB | Microsoft Word | View/Open |
TABLE 2.docx | Supplementary material | 16.66 kB | Microsoft Word | View/Open |
TABLE 3.docx | Supplementary material | 16.32 kB | Microsoft Word | View/Open |
1-s2.0-S1466853X18300956-main.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 785.49 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
16
checked on Sep 3, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
48
checked on Jul 13, 2024
Page view(s)
80
checked on Aug 29, 2022
Download(s)
218
checked on Aug 29, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.