Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27678
Title: How to quantify animal activity from radio-frequency identification (RFID) recordings
Authors: Iserbyt, Arne
Griffioen, Maaike
BORREMANS, Benny 
Eens, Marcel
Muller, Wendt
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: WILEY
Source: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 8(20), p. 10166-10174
Abstract: Automated animal monitoring via radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology allows efficient and extensive data sampling of individual activity levels and is therefore commonly used for ecological research. However, processing RFID data is still a largely unresolved problem, which potentially leads to inaccurate estimates for behavioral activity. One of the major challenges during data processing is to isolate independent behavioral actions from a set of superfluous, nonindependent detections. As a case study, individual blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) were simultaneously monitored during reproduction with both video recordings and RFID technology. We demonstrated how RFID data can be processed based on the time spent in- and outside a nest box. We then validated the number and timing of nest visits obtained from the processed RFID dataset by calibration against video recordings. The video observations revealed a limited overlap between the time spent in- and outside the nest box, with the least overlap at 23 s for both sexes. We then isolated exact arrival times from redundant RFID registrations by erasing all successive registrations within 23 s after the preceding registration. After aligning the processed RFID data with the corresponding video recordings, we observed a high accuracy in three behavioral estimates of parental care (individual nest visit rates, within-pair alternation and synchronization of nest visits). We provide a clear guideline for future studies that aim to implement RFID technology in their research. We argue that our suggested RFID data processing procedure improves the precision of behavioral estimates, despite some inevitable drawbacks inherent to the technology. Our method is useful, not only for other cavity breeding birds, but for a wide range of (in)vertebrate species that are large enough to be fitted with a tag and that regularly pass near or through a fixed antenna.
Notes: [Iserbyt, Arne; Griffioen, Maaike; Eens, Marcel; Muller, Wendt] Univ Antwerp, Behav Ecol & Ecophysiol Grp, Antwerp, Belgium. [Borremans, Benny] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA USA. [Borremans, Benny] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat I BIOST, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Keywords: animal activity; blue tits; data processing; data validation; parental care; passive integrated transponder tags; radio‐frequency identification technology;animal activity; blue tits; data processing; data validation; parental care; passive integrated transponder tags; radio-frequency identification technology
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27678
ISSN: 2045-7758
e-ISSN: 2045-7758
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4491
ISI #: 000449529800018
Rights: © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2019
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
iserbyt 1.pdfPublished version697.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Page view(s)

66
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

120
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.