Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27706
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENSWILLEN, Gert-
dc.contributor.authorDEPAIRE, Benoit-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T08:01:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-12T08:01:51Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBusiness & Information Systems Engineering, 61(6), p.713-728.-
dc.identifier.issn2363-7005-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/27706-
dc.description.abstractThe focus in the field of process mining, and process discovery in particular, has thus far been on exploring and describing event data by the means of models. Since the obtained models are often directly based on a sample of event data, the question whether they also apply to the real process typically remains unanswered. As the underlying process is unknown in real life, there is a need for unbiased estimators to assess the system-quality of a discovered model, and subsequently make assertions about the process. In this paper, an experiment is described and discussed to analyze whether existing fitness, precision and generalization metrics can be used as unbiased estimators of system fitness and system precision. The results show that important biases exist, which makes it currently nearly impossible to objectively measure the ability of a model to represent the system.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe computational resources and services used in this work for both process discovery and process conformance tasks were provided by the VSC (Flemish Supercomputer Center), funded by the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) and the Flemish Government.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER VIEWEG-SPRINGER FACHMEDIEN WIESBADEN GMBH-
dc.rightsSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018-
dc.subject.otherProcess mining-
dc.subject.otherProcess discovery-
dc.subject.otherProcess quality-
dc.subject.otherFitness-
dc.subject.otherPrecision-
dc.subject.otherGeneralization-
dc.subject.otherExploratory data analysis-
dc.subject.otherConfirmatory data analysis-
dc.titleTowards Confirmatory Process Discovery: Making Assertions About the Underlying System-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage728-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage713-
dc.identifier.volume61-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.placeABRAHAM-LINCOLN STASSE 46, WIESBADEN, 65189, GERMANY-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.type.programmeVSC-
dc.source.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12599-018-0567-8-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000496706700006-
dc.identifier.eissn1867-0202-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.contributorJANSSENSWILLEN, Gert-
item.contributorDEPAIRE, Benoit-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationJANSSENSWILLEN, Gert & DEPAIRE, Benoit (2019) Towards Confirmatory Process Discovery: Making Assertions About the Underlying System. In: Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(6), p.713-728..-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn2363-7005-
crisitem.journal.eissn1867-0202-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
p 1-17.pdfPeer-reviewed author version897.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Janssenswillen-Depaire2019_Article_TowardsConfirmatoryProcessDisc.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version951.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on May 1, 2024

Page view(s)

114
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

220
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.