Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27927
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN SCHOUBROECK, Sophie-
dc.contributor.authorSPRINGAEL, Johan-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DAEL, Miet-
dc.contributor.authorMALINA, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-22T13:54:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-22T13:54:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationResources, conservation and recycling, 144, p. 198-208-
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/27927-
dc.description.abstractBiobased chemistry has gained interest and has the potential to tackle some of the sustainability challenges the chemical industry must endure. Sustainability impacts need to be evaluated and monitored to highlight the advantages and pitfalls of different biobased routes over the entire product life cycle. This study aims for expert consensus concerning indicators needed and preferred for sustainability analysis of biobased chemicals in Europe. Experts are consulted by means of a Delphi method with stakeholders selected from three core groups: the private, public and academic sector. Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) is performed to gather data on the prioritization of the sustainability indicators per respondent. Afterwards, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is used to develop a consensus ranking among the experts. The results show that GHG emissions, market potential and acceptance of biobased materials are deemed the most crucial indicators for respectively environmental, economic and social sustainability. Expert consensus is positive in all three sustainability domains, with the strongest consensus measured for environmental sustainability showing a median Kendall’s τ of 0.63 (τ ranging from -1 to 1) and the weakest consensus found within social sustainability showing a median Kendall’s τ of 0.50. Further research can apply the ranked indicators on specific case studies to evaluate the practicability of the defined indicator set.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsCopyright 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.subject.otherBiobased chemicals; Sustainability indicators; Indicator selection; Delphi study; Best-worst scaling; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-
dc.titleSustainability indicators for biobased chemicals: A Delphi study using Multi- Criteria Decision Analysis-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage208-
dc.identifier.spage198-
dc.identifier.volume144-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesVan Schoubroeck, S (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, UHasselt, Agoralaan, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. sophie.vanschoubroeck@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.024-
dc.identifier.isi000461534800021-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.contributorVAN SCHOUBROECK, Sophie-
item.contributorSPRINGAEL, Johan-
item.contributorVAN DAEL, Miet-
item.contributorMALINA, Robert-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationVAN SCHOUBROECK, Sophie; SPRINGAEL, Johan; VAN DAEL, Miet; MALINA, Robert & VAN PASSEL, Steven (2019) Sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals: A Delphi study using Multi- Criteria Decision Analysis. In: Resources, conservation and recycling, 144, p. 198-208.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0921-3449-
crisitem.journal.eissn1879-0658-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Van Schoubroeck et al. (2019).pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version3.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Sophie Van Schoubroeck _ Clean Version.pdfPeer-reviewed author version926.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 5, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

154
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

370
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.