Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | VERBECQUE, Evi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schepens, Kirsten | - |
dc.contributor.author | There, Joke | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schepens, Benedicte | - |
dc.contributor.author | KLINGELS, Katrijn | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hallemans, Ann | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-09T09:45:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-09T09:45:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Pediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0898-5669 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Results on reliability and normative data for the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in children who are developing typically are systematically reviewed. Summary of Key Points: Six different TUG protocols are presented for which normative data are available for ages 3 to 18 years. TUG time is consistent within and between raters and sessions and is influenced by age. The choice of protocol, self-selected versus fastest walking speed, and use of a motivational aspect and of the outcome calculation affect TUG time as well as its consistency within and between sessions. Conclusions: A standard protocol for the TUG is lacking and should be developed with attention to reliability. Recommendations for Clinical Practice: If the TUG is to be used as a screening tool for dynamic balance control, clinicians need to apply protocols that include fastest walking speed motivation. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.rights | Copyright 2019 Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. | - |
dc.subject.other | children who are developing typically | - |
dc.subject.other | reference values | - |
dc.subject.other | reliability | - |
dc.subject.other | “reproducibility of results” [mesh] | - |
dc.subject.other | TUG | - |
dc.title | The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 31 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 22 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
dc.description.notes | Verbecque, E (reprint author), Campus Drie Eiken, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. evi.verbecque@uantwerpen.be | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Review | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000558 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000457589100009 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.fullcitation | VERBECQUE, Evi; Schepens, Kirsten; There, Joke; Schepens, Benedicte; KLINGELS, Katrijn & Hallemans, Ann (2018) The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review. In: Pediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31. | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2020 | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.contributor | VERBECQUE, Evi | - |
item.contributor | Schepens, Kirsten | - |
item.contributor | There, Joke | - |
item.contributor | Schepens, Benedicte | - |
item.contributor | KLINGELS, Katrijn | - |
item.contributor | Hallemans, Ann | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 0898-5669 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1538-005X | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
verbecque2019.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 380.47 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
EVerbecque_TUG_Review_AUTHOR COPY.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 639.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.