Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | VERBECQUE, Evi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schepens, Kirsten | - |
dc.contributor.author | There, Joke | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schepens, Benedicte | - |
dc.contributor.author | KLINGELS, Katrijn | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hallemans, Ann | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-09T09:45:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-09T09:45:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Pediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0898-5669 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Results on reliability and normative data for the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in children who are developing typically are systematically reviewed. Summary of Key Points: Six different TUG protocols are presented for which normative data are available for ages 3 to 18 years. TUG time is consistent within and between raters and sessions and is influenced by age. The choice of protocol, self-selected versus fastest walking speed, and use of a motivational aspect and of the outcome calculation affect TUG time as well as its consistency within and between sessions. Conclusions: A standard protocol for the TUG is lacking and should be developed with attention to reliability. Recommendations for Clinical Practice: If the TUG is to be used as a screening tool for dynamic balance control, clinicians need to apply protocols that include fastest walking speed motivation. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.rights | Copyright 2019 Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. | - |
dc.subject.other | children who are developing typically | - |
dc.subject.other | reference values | - |
dc.subject.other | reliability | - |
dc.subject.other | “reproducibility of results” [mesh] | - |
dc.subject.other | TUG | - |
dc.title | The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 31 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 22 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
dc.description.notes | Verbecque, E (reprint author), Campus Drie Eiken, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. evi.verbecque@uantwerpen.be | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Review | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000558 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000457589100009 | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2020 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.fullcitation | VERBECQUE, Evi; Schepens, Kirsten; There, Joke; Schepens, Benedicte; KLINGELS, Katrijn & Hallemans, Ann (2018) The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review. In: Pediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31. | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.contributor | VERBECQUE, Evi | - |
item.contributor | Schepens, Kirsten | - |
item.contributor | There, Joke | - |
item.contributor | Schepens, Benedicte | - |
item.contributor | KLINGELS, Katrijn | - |
item.contributor | Hallemans, Ann | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 0898-5669 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1538-005X | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
verbecque2019.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 380.47 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
EVerbecque_TUG_Review_AUTHOR COPY.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 639.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Sep 2, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
14
checked on Oct 13, 2024
Page view(s)
86
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
158
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.