Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVERBECQUE, Evi-
dc.contributor.authorSchepens, Kirsten-
dc.contributor.authorThere, Joke-
dc.contributor.authorSchepens, Benedicte-
dc.contributor.authorKLINGELS, Katrijn-
dc.contributor.authorHallemans, Ann-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-09T09:45:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-09T09:45:59Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationPediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31-
dc.identifier.issn0898-5669-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Results on reliability and normative data for the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in children who are developing typically are systematically reviewed. Summary of Key Points: Six different TUG protocols are presented for which normative data are available for ages 3 to 18 years. TUG time is consistent within and between raters and sessions and is influenced by age. The choice of protocol, self-selected versus fastest walking speed, and use of a motivational aspect and of the outcome calculation affect TUG time as well as its consistency within and between sessions. Conclusions: A standard protocol for the TUG is lacking and should be developed with attention to reliability. Recommendations for Clinical Practice: If the TUG is to be used as a screening tool for dynamic balance control, clinicians need to apply protocols that include fastest walking speed motivation.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsCopyright 2019 Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.-
dc.subject.otherchildren who are developing typically-
dc.subject.otherreference values-
dc.subject.otherreliability-
dc.subject.other“reproducibility of results” [mesh]-
dc.subject.otherTUG-
dc.titleThe Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage31-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage22-
dc.identifier.volume31-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesVerbecque, E (reprint author), Campus Drie Eiken, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. evi.verbecque@uantwerpen.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedReview-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PEP.0000000000000558-
dc.identifier.isi000457589100009-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationVERBECQUE, Evi; Schepens, Kirsten; There, Joke; Schepens, Benedicte; KLINGELS, Katrijn & Hallemans, Ann (2018) The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review. In: Pediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31.-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorVERBECQUE, Evi-
item.contributorSchepens, Kirsten-
item.contributorThere, Joke-
item.contributorSchepens, Benedicte-
item.contributorKLINGELS, Katrijn-
item.contributorHallemans, Ann-
crisitem.journal.issn0898-5669-
crisitem.journal.eissn1538-005X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
verbecque2019.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version380.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
EVerbecque_TUG_Review_AUTHOR COPY.pdfPeer-reviewed author version639.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.