Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004
Title: The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review
Authors: VERBECQUE, Evi 
Schepens, Kirsten
There, Joke
Schepens, Benedicte
KLINGELS, Katrijn 
Hallemans, Ann
Issue Date: 2018
Source: Pediatric physical therapy, 31 (1), p. 22-31
Abstract: Purpose: Results on reliability and normative data for the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in children who are developing typically are systematically reviewed. Summary of Key Points: Six different TUG protocols are presented for which normative data are available for ages 3 to 18 years. TUG time is consistent within and between raters and sessions and is influenced by age. The choice of protocol, self-selected versus fastest walking speed, and use of a motivational aspect and of the outcome calculation affect TUG time as well as its consistency within and between sessions. Conclusions: A standard protocol for the TUG is lacking and should be developed with attention to reliability. Recommendations for Clinical Practice: If the TUG is to be used as a screening tool for dynamic balance control, clinicians need to apply protocols that include fastest walking speed motivation.
Notes: Verbecque, E (reprint author), Campus Drie Eiken, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. evi.verbecque@uantwerpen.be
Keywords: children who are developing typically;reference values;reliability;“reproducibility of results” [mesh];TUG
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28004
ISSN: 0898-5669
e-ISSN: 1538-005X
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000558
ISI #: 000457589100009
Rights: Copyright 2019 Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
verbecque2019.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version380.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
EVerbecque_TUG_Review_AUTHOR COPY.pdfPeer-reviewed author version639.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.