Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/2839
Title: Again, what the philosophy of biology is not
Authors: CALLEBAUT, Werner 
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: SPRINGER
Source: ACTA BIOTHEORETICA, 53(2). p. 93-122
Abstract: There are many things that philosophy of biology might be. But, given the existence of a professional philosophy of biology that is arguably a progressive research program and, as such, unrivaled, it makes sense to define philosophy of biology more narrowly than the totality of intersecting concerns biologists and philosophers (let alone other scholars) might have. The reasons for the success of the "new" philosophy of biology remain poorly understood. I reflect on what Dutch and Flemish, and, more generally, European philosophers of biology could do to improve the situation of their discipline locally, regionally, and internationally, paying particular attention to the lessons to be learned from the "Science Wars."
Notes: Limburgs Univ Ctr, Fac Sci, Diepenbeek, Belgium. Konrad Lorenz Inst Evolut & Cognit Res, A-3422 Altenberg, Austria.Callebaut, W, Limburgs Univ Ctr, Fac Sci, Diepenbeek, Belgium.werner.callebaut@kli.ac.at
Keywords: bounded rationality; complexity; history of biology; "new" philosophy of biology; Philosophical naturalism; professionalization; Science Wars; Social studies of biology
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/2839
ISSN: 0001-5342
e-ISSN: 1572-8358
DOI: 10.1007/s10441-005-5352-7
ISI #: 000230844100004
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2006
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

70
checked on Jun 14, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.