Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28682
Title: No Effect of an Automated Bolus Calculator in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: The Expert Kids Study
Authors: Madsen, Jens Otto Broby
Casteels, Kristina
FIEUWS, Steffen 
Kristensen, Kurt
Vanbrabant, Koen
Ramon-Krauel, Marta
Johannesen, Jesper
Bontinck, Magda
Devisscher, Carine
Goicoechea, Irune
Hertz, Anne Marie
Jorgensen, Lene Kolle
Vandoorne, Eva
Yoldi, Carmen
Casteels, Kristian
Corripio, Raquel
Gonzalez-Vergaz, Amparo
Hernandez, Roque Cardona
Sanchez, Jacobo Perez
Van Aken, Sara
Vanbesien, Jesse
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
Source: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 21(6), p. 322-328
Abstract: Background: This multicenter crossover study investigated the potential beneficial effect of an automated bolus calculator (ABC) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with multiple daily injections (MDI). Methods: Participants were randomized to either begin or end with a 5 months intervention versus their regular treatment regimen (control), separated by a 2 months washout period. During the intervention participants were carefully instructed to use the ABC (Accu-Check Aviva Expert) versus manual insulin calculations during the control period. Participants between 8 and 18 years of age with T1D were recruited from clinics in Denmark, Belgium, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included T1D for >1 year, a minimum of 3 months MDI treatment before inclusion, and HbA1c of 7.5%-11% (57-97 mmol/mol). Improvement in HbA1c was the main outcome, and improved quality of life (QoL) and glucose variability (time spent in target glucose) were secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 65 patients with a mean age of 13.25 years and a mean HbA1c of 8.25% (66.7 mmol/mol) were included. Midway evaluation after 2 months of intervention showed no significant difference from the standard care (0.297, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.645 to 0.054; P = 0.10). The difference remained insignificant after the 5 months of intervention (-0.143 [95% CI: -0.558 to 0.272; P = 0.51]). Using the ABC did not change the time spent in target glucose range, nor did it change the QoL. Conclusions: Our study did not demonstrate beneficial additive effects of an ABC in children and adolescents with T1D treated with MDI neither in HbA1c, nor in any other endpoint investigated.
Notes: [Madsen, Jens Otto Broby; Johannesen, Jesper] Herlev Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat, Herlev, Denmark. [Casteels, Kristina] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Pediat, Leuven, Belgium. [Casteels, Kristina] Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Leuven, Belgium. [Fieuws, Steffen; Vanbrabant, Koen] KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Leuven, Belgium. [Fieuws, Steffen; Vanbrabant, Koen] Univ Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium. [Kristensen, Kurt] Skejby Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat, Aarhus, Denmark. [Ramon-Krauel, Marta] Hosp St Joan de Deu, Inst Recerca St Joan de Deu, Dept Endocrinol, Barcelona, Spain. [Johannesen, Jesper] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Keywords: Automated bolus calculator; type 1 diabetes; Pediatric; Multiple daily injections;Automated bolus calculator; type 1 diabetes; pediatric; multiple daily injections
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28682
ISSN: 1520-9156
e-ISSN: 1557-8593
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0064
ISI #: 000470003300004
Rights: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1089@dia.2019.0064.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version313.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

104
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

78
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.