Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29833| Title: | E.S. v. Austria | Authors: | SMET, Stijn | Issue Date: | 2019 | Source: | International Legal Materials, 50(3), p. 628-645 | Abstract: | In E.S. v. Austria, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a criminal conviction for making disparaging comments about the Prophet Muhammad, intimating in particular that he was a pedophile, did not violate the speaker's right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | Notes: | Publication consists of a case note (two pages) and the text of a judgment (remainder of pages). | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29833 | ISSN: | 0020-7829 | DOI: | 10.1017/ilm.2019.23 | Rights: | 2019 by The American Society of International Law | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | vabb 2021 |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smet, Note E.S. v. Austria.pdf Restricted Access | Non Peer-reviewed author version | 420.02 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
| smet2019.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 190.24 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Page view(s)
94
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
90
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.