Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29833| Title: | E.S. v. Austria | Authors: | SMET, Stijn | Issue Date: | 2019 | Source: | International Legal Materials, 50(3), p. 628-645 | Abstract: | In E.S. v. Austria, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a criminal conviction for making disparaging comments about the Prophet Muhammad, intimating in particular that he was a pedophile, did not violate the speaker's right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | Notes: | Publication consists of a case note (two pages) and the text of a judgment (remainder of pages). | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29833 | ISSN: | 0020-7829 | DOI: | 10.1017/ilm.2019.23 | Rights: | 2019 by The American Society of International Law | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | vabb 2021 |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smet, Note E.S. v. Austria.pdf Restricted Access | Non Peer-reviewed author version | 420.02 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
| smet2019.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 190.24 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.