Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29840
Title: The changing landscape of data monitoring committees-Perspectives from regulators, members, and sponsors
Authors: Bhattacharyya, Amit
Gallo, Paul
Crisp, Adam
LaVange, Lisa
MOLENBERGHS, Geert 
Petavy, Frank
Seltzer, Jonathan
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: WILEY
Source: BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 61(5), p. 1232-1241
Abstract: Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) are an integral part of clinical drug development. Their use has evolved along with changing study designs and regulatory expectations, which has associated statistical and ethical implications. Although there is guidance from the different regulatory agencies, there are opportunities to bring more consistency to address practical issues of establishing and operating a DMC. Challenging issues include defining the scope of DMC decisions, the regulatory requirements and expectations, the perceived independence of DMCs, the specific focus primarily on safety, etc. Wider use of adaptive clinical trial designs in recent years introduce additional challenges in terms of trial governance and the complexity of DMC activities. A panel comprised of clinical and statistical experts from across academia, industry, and regulatory agencies shared their experience and thoughts on the importance of these aspects and offered perspectives on the future of the DMCs. This paper documents the thinking from the panel session at the CEN-ISBS conference held in Vienna, Austria, 2017.
Notes: [Bhattacharyya, Amit; Seltzer, Jonathan] ACI Clin, 3 Bala Plaza West,Suite 402,251 St Asaphs Rd, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 USA. [Gallo, Paul] Novartis, One Hlth Plaza, E Hanover, NJ USA. [Crisp, Adam] GSK, Uxbridge, Middx, England. [LaVange, Lisa] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, CB 8030, Chapel Hill, NC USA. [Molenberghs, Geert] Univ Hasselt, CenStat, Hasselt, Belgium. [Petavy, Frank] European Med Agcy, London, England.
Keywords: adaptive design; clinical trial; data monitoring committee (DMC); EMA; futility; regulatory guideline; USFDA;adaptive design; clinical trial; data monitoring committee (DMC); EMA; futility; regulatory guideline; US FDA
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29840
ISSN: 0323-3847
e-ISSN: 1521-4036
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201700307
ISI #: 000483693900011
Rights: 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bhattacharyya_et_al-2019-Biometrical_Journal.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version181.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Biometrical Journal Resubmit - Nov 19 2018_clean.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version128.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

132
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

132
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.