Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30318
Title: | Split & Dual Screen Comparison of Classic vs Object-based Video | Authors: | WIJNANTS, Maarten COPPERS, Sven ROVELO RUIZ, Gustavo QUAX, Peter LAMOTTE, Wim |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Publisher: | ASSOC Computing Machinery | Source: | Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM ’19), ACM, p. 1035 -1037 | Abstract: | Over-the-top (OTT) streaming services like YouTube and Netflix induce massive amounts of video data, hereby putting substantial pressure on network infrastructure. This paper describes a demonstration of the object-based video (OBV) methodology that allows for the quality-variant MPEG-DASH streaming of respectively the background and foreground object(s) of a video scene. The OBV methodology is inspired by research into human visual attention and foveated compression, in that it allows to adaptively and dynamically assign bitrate to those portions of the visual scene that have the highest utility in terms of perceptual quality. Using a content corpus of interview-like video footage, the described demonstration proves the OBV methodology's potential to downsize video bitrate requirements while incurring at most marginal perceptual impact (i.e., in terms of subjective video quality). Thanks to its standards-compliant Web implementation, the OBV methodology is directly and broadly deployable without requiring capital expenditure. | Keywords: | video coding;H.264;HTTP Adaptive Streaming;MPEG-DASH;subjective evaluation;Web | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30318 | ISBN: | 9781450368896 | DOI: | 10.1145/3343031.3350582 | ISI #: | WOS:000509743400119 | Rights: | 2019 Owner/Author | Category: | C1 | Type: | Proceedings Paper | Validations: | ecoom 2022 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wijnants_Maarten_2019.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
3343031.3350582.pdf Restricted Access | Peer-reviewed author version | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Sep 2, 2020
Page view(s)
82
checked on Jul 5, 2022
Download(s)
16
checked on Jul 5, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.