Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30387
Title: | Measuring walking-related performance fatigability in clinical practice: a systematic review | Authors: | VAN GEEL, Fanny MOUMDJIAN, Lousin LAMERS, Ilse Bielen, Hanne FEYS, Peter |
Issue Date: | 2020 | Publisher: | EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA | Source: | European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 56 (1), p. 88-103. | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Fatigability, a change in performance according to tasks and circumstances, can contribute to walking limitations in daily life. Walking-related fatigability (WF) has been assessed subjectively, but current knowledge on best objective measurement methods is limited. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of objective clinical measurement methods assessing WF in different populations. DATA SOURCES: Articles were searched in Pubmed and Web Of Science by two independent raters. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Studies were included when meeting inclusion criteria of measuring WF objectively in a clinical setting, with no exclusion towards any population. Case studies and reviews were not included in the review (systematic review registration number: PROSPERO - CRD42017074121). PARTICIPANTS: In total, 28 articles were included. The study populations were older adults (n=7), multiple sclerosis (n=14), spinal muscle atrophy (n=3), osteoarthritis (n=3), interstitial lung diseases (n=1), and myasthenia gravis (n=1). STUDY APPRAISAL: Data about patient characteristics, walking task, WF formula and interpretation (cut-off values and/or psychometric properties) got extracted from included literature. Every included article got checked for quality and risk of bias. RESULTS: WF was mostly measured during longer walking test such as six minute walking test (6MWT) and 500 or 400-m walking test, by comparing the first and last minute or lap for spatiotemporal or kinematic changes in well-defined formulas. LIMITATIONS: No gold standard is however available yet given different tasks or outcome measures across study populations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Longer walking test were most often used, with a preference towards the 6MWT, thereby comparing the changes over the last and first part of the test. Psychometric properties need more documentation before inclusion as experimental outcome. | Keywords: | Fatigue;Motor fatigability;Walking;Assessment;Clinical Practice | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30387 | ISSN: | 1973-9087 | e-ISSN: | 1973-9095 | DOI: | 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05878-7 | ISI #: | WOS:000517771000011 | Rights: | 2020 Edizioni Minerva Medica | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2021 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VanGeel et al. EJPRM- walkingFatigabilityReview.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 2.12 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
R33Y2020N01A0088.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 774.88 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.