Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30387
Title: | Measuring walking-related performance fatigability in clinical practice: a systematic review | Authors: | VAN GEEL, Fanny MOUMDJIAN, Lousin LAMERS, Ilse Bielen, Hanne FEYS, Peter |
Issue Date: | 2020 | Publisher: | Source: | European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 56(1), p. 88-103. | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Fatigability, a change in performance according to tasks and circumstances, can contribute to walking limitations in daily life. Walking-related fatigability (WF) has been assessed subjectively, but current knowledge on best objective measurement methods is limited. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of objective clinical measurement methods assessing WF in different populations. DATA SOURCES: Articles were searched in Pubmed and Web Of Science by two independent raters. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Studies were included when meeting inclusion criteria of measuring WF objectively in a clinical setting, with no exclusion towards any population. Case studies and reviews were not included in the review (systematic review registration number: PROSPERO - CRD42017074121). PARTICIPANTS: In total, 28 articles were included. The study populations were older adults (n=7), multiple sclerosis (n=14), spinal muscle atrophy (n=3), osteoarthritis (n=3), interstitial lung diseases (n=1), and myasthenia gravis (n=1). STUDY APPRAISAL: Data about patient characteristics, walking task, WF formula and interpretation (cut-off values and/or psychometric properties) got extracted from included literature. Every included article got checked for quality and risk of bias. RESULTS: WF was mostly measured during longer walking test such as six minute walking test (6MWT) and 500 or 400-m walking test, by comparing the first and last minute or lap for spatiotemporal or kinematic changes in well-defined formulas. LIMITATIONS: No gold standard is however available yet given different tasks or outcome measures across study populations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Longer walking test were most often used, with a preference towards the 6MWT, thereby comparing the changes over the last and first part of the test. Psychometric properties need more documentation before inclusion as experimental outcome. | Keywords: | Fatigue;Motor fatigability;Walking;Assessment;Clinical Practice | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30387 | ISSN: | 1973-9087 | e-ISSN: | 1973-9095 | DOI: | 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05878-7 | ISI #: | WOS:000517771000011 | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2021 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VanGeel et al. EJPRM- walkingFatigabilityReview.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 2.12 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
R33Y2020N01A0088.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 774.88 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
4
checked on Sep 7, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
26
checked on Apr 22, 2024
Page view(s)
56
checked on Jul 14, 2022
Download(s)
66
checked on Jul 14, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.