Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30613
Title: Randomized controlled trial combining constraint-induced movement therapy and action-observation training in unilateral cerebral palsy: clinical effects and influencing factors of treatment response
Authors: Simon-Martinez, Cristina
Mailleux, Lisa
HOSKENS, Jasmine 
Ortibus, Els
Jaspers, Ellen
Wenderoth, Nicole
Sgandurra, Giuseppina
Cioni, Giovanni
Motenaers, Guy
KLINGELS, Katrijn 
Feys, Hilde
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Source: THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, 13 (Art N° 1756286419898065)
Abstract: Introduction: Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) improves upper limb (UL) motor execution in unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP). As these children also show motor planning deficits, action-observation training (AOT) might be of additional value. Here, we investigated the combined effect of AOT to CIMT and identified factors influencing treatment response. Methods: A total of 44 children with uCP (mean 9 years 6 months, SD 1 year 10 months) participated in a 9-day camp wearing a splint for 6 h/day and were allocated to the CIMT + AOT (n = 22) and the CIMT + placebo group (n = 22). The CIMT + AOT group received 15 h of AOT (i.e. video-observation) and executed the observed tasks, whilst the CIMT + AOT group watched videos free of biological motion and executed the same tasks. The primary outcome measure was bimanual performance. Secondary outcomes included measures of body function and activity level assessed before (T1), after the intervention (T2), and at 6 months follow-up (T3). Influencing factors included behavioural and neurological characteristics. Results: Although no between-groups differences were found (p > 0.05; eta(2) = 0-16), the addition of AOT led to higher gains in children with initially poorer bimanual performance (p = 0.02; eta(2) = 0.14). Both groups improved in all outcome measures after the intervention and retained the gains at follow up (p < 0.01; eta(2) = 0.02-0.71). Poor sensory function resulted in larger improvements in the total group (p = 0.03; eta(2) = 0.25) and high amounts of mirror movements tended to result in a better response to the additional AOT training (p = 0.06; eta(2) = 0.18). Improvements were similar irrespective of the type of brain lesion or corticospinal tract wiring pattern. Conclusions: Adding AOT to CIMT, resulted in a better outcome for children with poor motor function and high amounts of mirror movements. CIMT with or without AOT seems to be more beneficial for children with poor sensory function.
Notes: Simon-Martinez, C (reprint author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, Herestr 49,Bus 1510, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.; Simon-Martinez, C (reprint author), Univ Appl Sci Western Switzerland, HES SO Valais Sierre, Informat Syst Inst, Sierre, Switzerland.
cristina.simon@kuleuven.be
Other: Simon-Martinez, C (reprint author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, Herestr 49,Bus 1510, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium, Univ Appl Sci Western Switzerland, HES SO Valais Sierre, Informat Syst Inst, Sierre, Switzerland. cristina.simon@kuleuven.be
Keywords: Upper limb;Unilateral cerebral palsy;Action Observation Training;Constraint Induced Movement Therapy;Intensive training;Predictors;Randomized Controlled Trials;Corticospinal Tract Wiring Pattern
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30613
ISSN: 1756-2856
e-ISSN: 1756-2864
DOI: 10.1177/1756286419898065
ISI #: WOS:000506391000001
Rights: The Author(s), 2020. Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2021
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
randomized_martinez.pdfPublished version1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

38
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

10
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.