Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30882
Title: Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Across Chronic Kidney Disease Stages
Authors: Ter Maaten, Jozine M.
MARTENS, Pieter 
L'Hoyes, Wouter
Maass, Alexander H.
Damman, Kevin
DUPONT, Matthias 
MULLENS, Wilfried 
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
Source: JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 25 (10) , p. 803 -811
Abstract: Introduction: Limited data are available concerning the effect of severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) because these patients are commonly excluded from trials. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of CRT on renal function, reverse remodeling and outcome across all stages of CKD in a large patient population of recipients of CRT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 798 consecutive patients with heart failure who were undergoing CRT implantation between October 2008 and September 2016. Renal function data were available at baseline and at 6 months following CRT. Remodeling based on left ventricular end diastolic volume/left ventricular ejection fraction (LVESV/LVEF) and clinical outcome was assessed using a combined endpoint of all -cause mortality and hospitalization because of heart failure. Results: Median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 62.8 (43.6-77.8) mL/min/1.73 m2. Of the patients, 33.6% were in CKD stage 3, 11.0% in stage 4 and 1.1% in stage 5. LVEF and LVESV improved across all CKD stages; however, patients with CKD stages 1 and 2 exhibited a greater degree of improvement in LVEF (median 15% vs 10%, P < 0.001) and LVESV (median 37.2% vs 29.9%, P < 0.001) compared to patients with CKD stages 3-5. Despite a greater degree of reverse remodeling in CKD stages 1 and 2, the most accurate cut-off of remodeling predicting good clinical outcome was lower for patients with CKD stage 3-5, respectively: 5.5% vs 9.5% (LVEF) and 6.67% vs 12.41% (LVESV). Conclusions: CRT results in reverse remodeling across all stages of CKD, although to a lesser extent in patients with renal dysfunction (CKD stage 3-5). However, patients with CKD derive benefit on outcome at a lesser degree of remodeling.
Notes: Mullens, W (reprint author), Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Cardiol, Schiepse Bos 6, B-3600 Genk, Belgium.
wilfried.mullens@zol.be
Other: Mullens, W (reprint author), Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Cardiol, Schiepse Bos 6, B-3600 Genk, Belgium. wilfried.mullens@zol.be
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy;chronic kidney disease;heart failure;response
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30882
ISSN: 1071-9164
e-ISSN: 1532-8414
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.07.005
ISI #: WOS:000495806200005
Rights: 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jozine.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version558.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

40
checked on Jul 22, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Jul 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.