Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31410
Title: Practices, organisation, and regulatory aspects in advising on antibiotic prescription: the international ESCMID AntibioLegalMap survey
Authors: Tebano, Gianpiero
Dyar, Oliver J.
Beovic, Bojana
Claudot, Frederique
BERAUD, Guillaume 
Thilly, Nathalie
Pulcini, Celine
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
Source: INFECTION, 47 (5) , p. 749 -760
Abstract: Purpose Giving advice about antibiotic prescription through dedicated consultations is a cornerstone of antibiotic stewardship programmes. Our objective was to explore practices, organisation, and regulatory requirements related to antibiotic advising. Methods We performed an international, exploratory, Internet-based, cross-sectional survey targeting infectious diseases and clinical microbiology specialists. It was disseminated through ESCMID and ESGAP networks. Results Answers from 830 participants (74 countries, 77% of participants from Europe) were collected. Consultations were mostly given on demand (81%, 619/764), while unsolicited consultations targeting specific conditions (e.g., positive blood culture) were less frequent (66%, 501/764). Consultations usually included indications on diagnostic work-up and follow-up (>79%). Curbside consultations (i.e., without examining the patient) were reported by 82% (598/733) of respondents, mainly by phone (89%, 531/598). The referring physician was considered authorised not to follow the advice by 57% (383/676). Direct consultations (i.e., after examining the patient) were recorded in the medical file more frequently than curbside consultations (69%, 472/689 vs 35%, 206/592). Concerning legal liability, the majority of respondents considered that it is shared between the adviser and the referring physician, who, however, is considered primarily responsible. The advisers' liability was considered to be lower in cases of curbside and unrecorded consultations. Significant inter-countries and intra-country variability were identified, suggesting that the setting markedly influenced practices. Conclusion Significant variability exists in the practice of antibiotic advising. This concerns both the organisation of care and how advisers perceive regulatory requirements. These elements must be taken into account when implementing antibiotic stewardship programmes and when training stewards.
Notes: Tebano, G (reprint author), Univ Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.; Tebano, G (reprint author), Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, AP HP, Dept Infect Dis, Paris, France.
gianpiero.tebano@gmail.com
Keywords: Antibiotic prescribing;Consultation;Antibiotic stewardship;Regulation;Professional liability
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31410
ISSN: 0300-8126
e-ISSN: 1439-0973
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-019-01298-2
ISI #: WOS:000509101900006
Rights: Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tebano2019_Article_PracticesOrganisationAndRegula.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version546.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.