Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32652
Title: Increasing experience of modified two‐stage transanal ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for therapy refractory ulcerative colitis. What have we learned? A retrospective analysis on 75 consecutive cases at a tertiary referral hospital
Authors: Bislenghi, G.
Martin-Perez, B.
FIEUWS, Steffen 
Wolthuis, A.
D'Hoore, A.
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: WILEY
Source: COLORECTAL DISEASE,
Abstract: Aim Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) should be delayed to a second stage in patients with ulcerative colitis and prolonged exposure to medical therapy. However, there is still discussion about whether a modified two-stage approach is preferable to a three-stage approach. Recently, a transanal approach has been introduced to overcome the well-known difficulties of laparoscopic pelvic surgery. This paper presents short-term outcomes of transanal IPAA (Ta-IPAA) according to a modified two-stage approach. Methods Data from all patients who underwent a modified two-stage Ta-IPAA for ulcerative colitis refractory to medical therapy were retrieved retrospectively from a prospective database. A comprehensive complication index was used for 90-day postoperative complications. Conversion, duration of surgery, hospital stay and reoperation were considered. A logistic regression model was used to assess risk factors for peri-pouch sepsis. Results Seventy-five (68.8%) patients were identified from 109 consecutive IPAAs. Median operation time was 159 min. Conversion rate was 4%. Mean comprehensive complication index was 7. All anastomotic leaks (10.6%) were treated with diverting ileostomy. Additionally, active rescue with transanal drainage and early resuturing of the anastomotic gap was performed in six patients. Ileostomy closure occurred after a median period of 5.4 months. At univariable analysis, factors associated with peri-pouch sepsis were male gender and age at IPAA construction. Conclusions A modified two-stage Ta-IPAA is safe and feasible. Standardization and reproducibility of the technique are reflected in few conversions and intra-operative complications. Finally, morbidity and anastomotic leak do not differ from those reported in previous Ta-IPAA series with a variable proportion of multistage procedures.
Notes: Bislenghi, G (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Abdominal Surg, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
gabriele.bislenghi@uzleuven.be
Other: Bislenghi, G (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Abdominal Surg, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. gabriele.bislenghi@uzleuven.be
Keywords: Close rectal dissection;ileal pouch anal anastomosis;modified two-stage approach;surgery;transanal minimally invasive surgery;ulcerative colitis
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32652
ISSN: 1462-8910
e-ISSN: 1463-1318
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15231
ISI #: WOS:000552879800001
Rights: ª 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2021
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bislenghi_G_2020.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version326.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.