Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32968
Title: THE POTENTIAL OF DONOR-DERIVED CELL-FREE DNA AS A BIOMARKER FOR REJECTION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Authors: Wijtvliet, Veerle
Plaeke, Philip
ABRAMS, Steven 
HENS, Niel 
Gielis, Els
Hellemans, Rachel
De Winter, Benedicte
Abramowicz, Daniel
Ledeganck, Kristien
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Source: NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 35 (S3) , p. 190 -190 (Art N° TO009)
Abstract: Background and Aims: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is actively studied as a non-invasive biomarker for the diagnosis of kidney allograft rejection, with conflicting results being reported. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a clear overview of the potential value of dd-cfDNA to diagnose kidney rejection, and specifically antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library using the search terms: "cell free DNA AND kidney transplantation". We included studies that 1) described dd-cfDNA fractions in blood of kidney allograft recipients; and 2) were published as English original research papers between January 1, 1994 and November 26, 2019. The methodological quality was assessed by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Out of 287 hits, 55 duplicates were removed. 232 remaining abstracts were screened, leaving 36 articles for full-text review, of which 11 were included in a systematic review and data from 7 articles were synthesized in a meta-analysis. A weighted median of medians (WMM) (median with 95% confidence interval (CI) in squared brackets) was computed as a pooled estimate for the median dd-cfDNA fractions in different groups of patients. A meta-analysis was prespecified to be performed among following patient groups: 1) ABMR patients; 2) T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) patients; 3) stable patients; 4) patients without rejection at indication biopsy. The pooled ABMR group consisted of patient groups with pure ABMR and/or mixed ABMR/TCMR. Weighted median differences of medians (WMDM) were estimated for pairwise comparisons among the aforementioned groups, according to the approach proposed by McGrath et al. (2019).
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32968
ISSN: 0931-0509
e-ISSN: 1460-2385
ISI #: WOS:000562392102167
Category: M
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ordner1.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version243.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.