Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32994
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMertens, Inge-
dc.contributor.authorWillems, Hanny-
dc.contributor.authorLoon, Elisabet Van-
dc.contributor.authorSchildermans, Karin-
dc.contributor.authorBoonen, Kurt-
dc.contributor.authorBaggerman, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorVALKENBORG, Dirk-
dc.contributor.authorGwinner, Wilfried-
dc.contributor.authorAnglicheau, Dany-
dc.contributor.authorEssig, Marie-
dc.contributor.authorMarquet, Pierre-
dc.contributor.authorNaesens, Maarten-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T08:44:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-22T08:44:45Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-11-18T12:50:17Z-
dc.identifier.citationKidney International Reports, 5 (9) , p. 1448 -1458-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/32994-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) impacts kidney allograft outcome. The diagnosis is made based on findings from invasive kidney transplant biopsy specimens. The aim of this study was to identify a noninvasive urinary protein biomarker for ABMR after kidney transplantation. Methods: We performed a multicenter case-control study to identify a urinary biomarker for ABMR (training cohort, n = 249) and an independent, prospective multicenter cohort study for validation (n = 391). We used concomitant biopsies to classify the samples according to the Banff classification. After untargeted protein identification and quantification, we used a support vector machine to train the model in the training cohort. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of the urinary biomarker for ABMR in the validation cohort. Results: We identified a set of 10 urinary proteins that accurately discriminated patients with (n = 60) and without (n = 189) ABMR in the training cohort with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.00). The diagnostic accuracy was maintained in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.8-0.93) for discriminating the presence (n = 43) from the absence (n = 348) of ABMR. The negative predictive value of the 10-protein marker set for exclusion of ABMR was 0.99, and the positive predictive value was 0.33. The diagnostic accuracy was independent of the reason for performing the biopsy, time after transplantation, and better than the accuracy of gross proteinuria (AUC, 0.76). Conclusions: We identified and validated a urinary protein biomarker set that can be used to exclude ABMR. (C) 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe BIOMARGIN study is funded by the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) of the European Commission, in the HEALTH.2012.1.4-1 theme for innovative approaches to solid organ transplantation, with grant agreement 305499. MN is senior clinical investigator of The Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) (1844019N). EVL holds a fellowship grant (1143919N) from The Research Foundation Flanders (FWO). We thank the clinical centers of the BIOMARGIN consortium, the clinicians and surgeons, nursing staff,and the patients. We thank Aline Schindele and the team at Venn Life Sciences SAS (France) for their invaluable help with sample collection, annotation, shipment, and the eCRF (Electronic Case Report Form) database.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.rights2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.subject.otherantibody-mediated rejection-
dc.subject.othernoninvasive biomarker-
dc.subject.otherrenal transplantation-
dc.subject.otherurinary proteomics-
dc.titleUrinary Protein Biomarker Panel for the Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1458-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage1448-
dc.identifier.volume5-
local.format.pages11-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesNaesens, M (corresponding author), Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Nephrol & Renal Transplantat, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesmaarten.naesens@kuleuven.be-
dc.description.otherNaesens, M (corresponding author), Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Nephrol & Renal Transplantat, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. maarten.naesens@kuleuven.be-
local.publisher.placeSTE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ekir.2020.06.018-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000568662700010-
dc.contributor.orcidVan Loon, Elisabet/0000-0001-9796-9157; Essig,-
dc.contributor.orcidMarie/0000-0002-2030-5616; Mertens, Inge/0000-0002-4888-3485-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.description.affiliation[Mertens, Inge; Willems, Hanny; Schildermans, Karin; Boonen, Kurt; Baggerman, Geert] VITO, Ctr Prote, Hlth Unit, Mol, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Mertens, Inge; Willems, Hanny; Schildermans, Karin; Boonen, Kurt; Baggerman, Geert] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Prote, Antwerp, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Loon, Elisabet Van; Naesens, Maarten] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Loon, Elisabet Van; Naesens, Maarten] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Nephrol & Kidney Transplantatc, Leuven, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Valkenborg, Dirk] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Dept Math & Stat, Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Gwinner, Wilfried] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Nephrol, Hannover, Germany.-
local.description.affiliation[Anglicheau, Dany] Necker Enfants Malades Hosp, Dept Nephrol & Kidney Transplantat, Adult Nephrol Renal Transplant Serv, Paris, France.-
local.description.affiliation[Essig, Marie; Marquet, Pierre] CHU Limoges, Dept Nephrol, Limoges, France.-
local.description.affiliation[Marquet, Pierre] Univ Limoges, Dept Nephrol, Lab Med Pharmacol, Limoges, France.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.contributorMertens, Inge-
item.contributorWillems, Hanny-
item.contributorLoon, Elisabet Van-
item.contributorSchildermans, Karin-
item.contributorBoonen, Kurt-
item.contributorBaggerman, Geert-
item.contributorVALKENBORG, Dirk-
item.contributorGwinner, Wilfried-
item.contributorAnglicheau, Dany-
item.contributorEssig, Marie-
item.contributorMarquet, Pierre-
item.contributorNaesens, Maarten-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2021-
item.fullcitationMertens, Inge; Willems, Hanny; Loon, Elisabet Van; Schildermans, Karin; Boonen, Kurt; Baggerman, Geert; VALKENBORG, Dirk; Gwinner, Wilfried; Anglicheau, Dany; Essig, Marie; Marquet, Pierre & Naesens, Maarten (2020) Urinary Protein Biomarker Panel for the Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients. In: Kidney International Reports, 5 (9) , p. 1448 -1458.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn2468-0249-
crisitem.journal.eissn2468-0249-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2468024920313413-main.pdfPublished version1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

34
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

10
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.