Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33273
Title: A method for performing film dosimetry as part of a postal audit service by a recalibration process
Authors: YALVAC, Burak 
RENIERS, Brigitte 
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: 
Source: ESTRO 2020: Abstract book, p. 1008 -1008 (Art N° 1783)
Abstract: A method for performing film dosimetry as part of a postal audit service by a recalibration process TOTAL CHARACTERS TITLE: 99 (limit 100 characters) TOTAL CHARACTERS ABSTRACT INCLUDING SPACE: 578+946+769+609 = 2902 (limit 3000 characters including space) Purpose/Objective (578 characters with space) We perform postal dosimetry audits using alanine/EPR and film dosimetry. For postal audits, it is very difficult to control the time window between scanning and irradiation. The films should also be possible to rescan if required even after very long times (order of years). This work evaluates our procedure wherein we compensate for the time delay and various scanner effects using the "one-scan" method (1). We investigated for post-exposure changes, lot-to-lot variability, different dose-response functions and the necessity of accuracy of the delivered dose for rescaling. Material and Methods (946 characters with space) In the context of an audit, the centres irradiated an anthropomorphic phantom that contained EBT3 film and alanine detectors with an IMRT/VMAT plan. Besides, they irradiated a PMMA plate containing film and alanine detectors in contact with each other using a uniform field at a dose similar to the dose prescribed in the VMAT plan. This film was used to rescale the film calibration curve. Films from previous audits were rescanned multiple times and compared to the patient plans and the dose maps of the original scans. Dose maps were generated from films of 4 different lots with one of the lots having a different marker dye. Two dose-response functions were used for the calibration of 3 of the 4 lots. The calibration curve of the last lot was only possible to fit with one of the functions. The sensitivity of the rescaling dose was investigated by recalculating the dose maps with artificially altered doses for the rescaling films. Results (769 characters with space) For the comparison to the patient plans, the passing rates are nearly unchanged (≥ 99%) using gamma analysis with 3%/3mm (Table 1) for the different scan times and using different lots. The only exception is lot C3 that could only be fitted with a cubic function. Some deviations are observed when the cubic function is used and when the marker dye of the calibration and test films is different. The passing rates were unchanged when the rescaling dose was altered by 1% but started to fluctuate when the dose was altered by 2%. The dose maps were compared with each other using gamma analysis with 2%/2mm. The passing rates are ≥ 99% with the exception of lot C3 and using the cubic function with lots having a different marker dye for the calibration and test films. Conclusion (609 characters with space) We showed that it is possible to use film dosimetry for postal audit services using a rescaling method. These results show that it might be possible to use a generic calibration curve for EBT3 films in combination with the rescaling method. Users must however be careful not to mix film lots that have a different marker dye and a different dose-response function. The delivered dose to the calibration films should be determined with an accuracy of ≤1%.
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33273
Link to publication/dataset: https://www.cld.bz/WxarAcp/1008/
ISSN: 0167-8140
e-ISSN: 1879-0887
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8140(21)01801-6
Category: C1
Type: Proceedings Paper
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yalvac_ESTRO2020_abstract_final.pdfPeer-reviewed author version777.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Yalvac_ESTRO2020_poster_v3.pdfSupplementary material971.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
1-s2.0-S0167814021018016-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version321.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on May 20, 2022

Download(s)

8
checked on May 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.